[ronaldx]

You can also pass the test this way by having "generous" judges contributing to the 1/3, which is likely because the judges are not impartial: they are emotionally invested in being part of a positive result. I wonder how Kevin Warwick himself voted, for example.

A more correct test (which admittedly doesn't cover this issue) would be to give each judge a conversation with one human and one computer, and for them to say which one they believe is the human.

[thisjepisje]

>to give each judge a conversation with one human and one computer, and for them to say which one they believe is the human.

I always assumed this was exactly what the Turing test was about. Guess I was wrong.

[andreasvc]

This is indeed what the Turing test as originally proposed is about.