(no title)
ronaldx | 11 years ago
Chimerism is a possible explanation but vanishingly unlikely. Two identified cases, ever (i.e. none before this).
This is news because it's exceptional.
ronaldx | 11 years ago
Chimerism is a possible explanation but vanishingly unlikely. Two identified cases, ever (i.e. none before this).
This is news because it's exceptional.
voidlogic|11 years ago
The smoking gun in this case that there was not a scam, but something more going on is the fact that she was her kids aunt.
ronaldx|11 years ago
Chimerism is well-studied because it's biologically interesting, but most social/medical professionals are not expected to come across human chimerism in their whole career.
Chimerism not often documented in humans and the other possibilities (e.g. surrogacy scam) are hugely more probable explanations.
seacious|11 years ago
rcthompson|11 years ago
cmiles74|11 years ago
I would argue Occam's Razor decides against such a large conspiracy and, instead, points to problems with the test.
josu|11 years ago
If you go as far as that, why wouldn't you test mitochondrial DNA? Using Ocamm's razor myself, I will speculate that she wasn't able to get a very good lawyer.
ronaldx|11 years ago
1. Mitochondrial DNA is less apt than regular DNA to accurately identify motherhood since it has a low mutation rate.
2. The mitochondria would still come from the chimeric cells which still are a generation away from the mother's cells.
3. If you have have considered the possibility of chimerism, there are much simpler tests - e.g. the tests that they did do.
Someone|11 years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(genetics)#Humans gives an earlier case and references http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.149..., which states blood type chimerism occurs in 8% of twins, 21% of triplets.
So, chimerism in the broad sense isn't that rare. I have no idea whether that is different from what is described here, but I would think it isn't. Those blood cells have to come from somewhere.
Chimerism also occurs as a result of organ transplants.
nraynaud|11 years ago
(well I come form a country where the judicial system is inquisitory, not accusatory, so maybe I'm biased in my point of view)
khc|11 years ago
It's very rare but not THAT rare.