South Africa had much more land for the conquered, even during apartheid.
Israel has set aside massive amounts of land to its previous inhabitants.
Canada certainly has much more land set aside, though I expect it's equally marginal.
More generally...
Japan-SK
Japan-Taiwan
UK-India
Overall it seems rare for conquerers to commit a genocide and set aside marginal lands for the previous inhabitants. Usually it makes more economic sense to take the existing population and use political violence to extract labor and resources out of them.
Consider that the land that was set aside was often poor land that nobody else wanted. And then, to add insult to injury, the land would often be taken again if valuable natural resources were discovered.
scarmig|11 years ago
Thinking of colonizers...
South Africa had much more land for the conquered, even during apartheid.
Israel has set aside massive amounts of land to its previous inhabitants.
Canada certainly has much more land set aside, though I expect it's equally marginal.
More generally...
Japan-SK
Japan-Taiwan
UK-India
Overall it seems rare for conquerers to commit a genocide and set aside marginal lands for the previous inhabitants. Usually it makes more economic sense to take the existing population and use political violence to extract labor and resources out of them.
locopati|11 years ago
judk|11 years ago
ry0ohki|11 years ago