Freshmeat.net, 1997-2014
280 points| ingve | 11 years ago |jeffcovey.net | reply
http://jeffcovey.net/2014/06/19/freshmeat-net-1997-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-2111
280 points| ingve | 11 years ago |jeffcovey.net | reply
http://jeffcovey.net/2014/06/19/freshmeat-net-1997-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-2111
[+] [-] liedra|11 years ago|reply
Another story I remember is all the flak we got when we opened the osx.freshmeat.net section - we got so much criticism about how we'd sold out etc. etc. but it actually turned out to be quite a good repository for OS X apps for a while until iTunes kinda took over.
Good times :D
[+] [-] chrissnell|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] contingencies|11 years ago|reply
(Re: reply. Err .. as an ethicist I'm not sure how you actually wrote that! If push came to shove - and I highly doubt they'll give you personal problems for visiting - have you no faith in your institution to protect you? Talk about chilling effects... you have to make sure you go now, so you maintain some self respect and score a fun lecture lead-in!)
[+] [-] stonogo|11 years ago|reply
Before, it was possible to find, for example, a TUI email client written in perl with a BSD license, thanks to the ability to drill down into the trove. After the redesign, it was goddamn near impossible to find anything -- especially things with specific licenses.
I, and just about everyone I know who used it, stopped using it not long after they started focusing on toy web programming more than information curation. I'm sad they mismanaged it to death, but I'm not going to miss it in its terminal state.
[+] [-] mariuz|11 years ago|reply
For example befora i could do releases for beta and stable versions but after i had just kind of worthless tags also i had svn branches for each kind of relases
http://freecode.com/projects/firebird
I guess in time also sourforge will die , almost all open source development is moved to github these days
[+] [-] js2|11 years ago|reply
Anyway, as I recall I was able to purchase 140 shares at $30. The day of the IPO it hit $300+ and I was too stupid to sell (gotta get those long term capital gains rates..doh). I finally sold those shares years later at something like $1.
Oh well. You win some you lose some.
[+] [-] np422|11 years ago|reply
A few of my classmates from my university registered a funny domain name and made something that could be mistaken for a website, consisting mostly of static html-pages and sold that to some venture capitalists and they are still living of the capital from that sale.
So unlike you, I'm still kind of bitter about my missed VA-linux IPO....
[+] [-] chrissnell|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] davidw|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ebiester|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Gracana|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jstsch|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] blablabla123|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] buster|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rachelbythebay|11 years ago|reply
https://web.archive.org/web/19980419152907/http://freshmeat....
[+] [-] blablabla123|11 years ago|reply
But in the tar xzf ... ; ./configure && make && sudo make install time it was really nice.
I wished something like that existed for JS libraries.
[+] [-] nathanstitt|11 years ago|reply
I find http://jsdb.io/ works pretty well for JS libraries. You might find it useful.
[+] [-] ris|11 years ago|reply
But without resources like freshmeat, how are the packagers supposed to find out about new software to package. There is still one hell of a lot more unpackaged software than there is packaged, and finding it is going to become ever more difficult.
I'm personally quite annoyed by freshmeat's shutdown - I still checked it every (other) day.
[+] [-] the_eradicator|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] matt__rose|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] petercooper|11 years ago|reply
Can anyone explain this and whether it's still relevant?
[+] [-] zeruch|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] harrystone|11 years ago|reply
It surprised me how much emotional impact this announcement had for me. I hate to see freshmeat go, even if it wasn't much anymore compared to what it was. Oh well, you can't go home again.
[+] [-] macintux|11 years ago|reply
An institution for a very long time, definitely something from a different era. Farewell old friend.
[+] [-] pierlux|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Zelphyr|11 years ago|reply
As a former employee of [VA [Research[ Systems]|Linux|Software] SourceForge] I also heard this. Though I believe Slashdot was also a profit center for awhile.
[+] [-] bane|11 years ago|reply
The basic problem is that so many of the other properties were virtually impossible to monetize and/or by the time attention got turned on them audience had moved elsewhere and the result was a mess.
It also didn't help that many of the senior people brought in to help turn the properties into money making operations really had never done business with this demographic.
[+] [-] zeruch|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dspeyer|11 years ago|reply
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=5948
[+] [-] keithpeter|11 years ago|reply
However, contrast esr
"Freshmeat/freecode required that every project creations and release be pre-moderated by humans. This was a serious bottleneck, and may have been the site’s undoing by imposing staffing costs on the operators. We need to avoid this."
with the highest level post by user liedra above who worked for the original project...
"We had stupidly high standards, and I don't think a lot of people really knew how much we threw out over the years, or how much we sanitised the entries (so much broken English!). We also had to (to a certain degree) sanity check the projects - make sure they looked like they did what they did."
Am I thinking that we are collectively saying we can't afford to add value through curation or editing?
[+] [-] mindcrime|11 years ago|reply
If anybody is interested: https://github.com/mindcrime/sourcehub
[+] [-] ben1040|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Patrick_Devine|11 years ago|reply
I think if we'd had any kind of fiscal responsibility we might have been able to survive the rocky years. At the time though, the idea was to ditch manufacturing and put everything behind SourceForge. In retrospect, that probably wasn't a horrible idea, except for that someone got the bright idea that the only way to for SourceForge to make money was to sell banner ads. I think GitHub proved that was a bad idea.
[+] [-] zeruch|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] inDigiNeous|11 years ago|reply
I used to scroll down the front page every day, looking at some cool new projects to test out.
Uploaded my first Open Source project, umix.sf.net, there too. Was really fun to see people downloading my software and see the statistics for how many clicks it had gotten.
Good time to kill it already, didn't even remember it still existing.
[+] [-] taspeotis|11 years ago|reply
I wonder how that's working out for them...
http://www.google.com.au/trends/explore#q=Slashdot%2C%20%2Fm...
[+] [-] adulau|11 years ago|reply
This would be a nice addition to http://ckan.org/.
[+] [-] mindcrime|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jimwalsh|11 years ago|reply
I feel like the late 90s was such a Wild West time for Linux. Linux is in a great spot now, best it has ever been, but for whatever reason the community just feels incredibly different for me now. It's probably just me aging.
[+] [-] jcd748|11 years ago|reply
You're right, though. Different times, and the community feels very different. The feel I get when I'm browsing web forums for answers to questions is a lot of kids who use Linux because it's somehow "cool", and certainly it's ridiculously easy to install these days. But I might just be making assumptions based on the terrible grammar and incomplete sentences.
[+] [-] BillyParadise|11 years ago|reply
I'll echo several other replies - it was great - nay, essential - before package managers became good.
Maybe they should have bought and changed their name to yum.com or apt-get.com (instead of freecode) and then more of us would still remember why they went to the site.
[+] [-] giis|11 years ago|reply
Thank you Freshmeat.net (aka freecode.com)
[+] [-] booleanbetrayal|11 years ago|reply
https://web.archive.org/web/19980419152907/http://freshmeat....
[+] [-] rg3|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] giis|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jamespo|11 years ago|reply