top | item 7954710

Ranking Startup Investors by Portfolio Momentum for Q2 2014

37 points| dmor | 11 years ago |mattermark.com | reply

14 comments

order
[+] Eliezer|11 years ago|reply
How is this score calculated? Would it look anything remotely like a chart of growth in total valuation of the portfolio? Without knowing more about the metrics, this chart is meaningless. In particulary, if we have a dozen different growth scores, which are all being weighted equally, averaged across all the companies in a portfolio regardless of current size or current valuation of VC stakes, these scores are almost absolutely meaningless.
[+] ChuckMcM|11 years ago|reply
That is an interesting technique. I noted Steamboat Ventures is at -88 and yet with the GoPro launch I expect they probably are going to have a good aggregate internal ROR. Would be interesting to try different slices against this, like rate of return vs growth. Back in the dot com days a lot of companies grew really fast, burning money, and then went 'poof!'. So from a growth metric they looked great, but from an ROI investment they were poor.
[+] dmor|11 years ago|reply
This is a really important insight as you read this study. We are starting to collect unrealized and realized IRR data from funds, and I hope we will be able to provide a more performance-based index ranking soon.
[+] samstave|11 years ago|reply
Does the fact the Fuel invested in MatterMark have any impact on Fuel's MatterMark score?
[+] fscof|11 years ago|reply
Crashed mobile safari both times I tried to open it. Anyone else experiencing this problem?
[+] DanBC|11 years ago|reply
Me too. Crashed my phone - I needed to power cycle.

(iPhone 4; iOS; chrome; nothing weird)

[+] jgalt212|11 years ago|reply
CTRL-F did not works under Chrome.
[+] applecore|11 years ago|reply
It'd be nice to be able to drill down and see an investor's portfolio of companies.
[+] pbreit|11 years ago|reply
If this were able to achieve any impact would it discourage longer term horizons?