Both my TV and my HTC One have Miracast support so i had this working a couple of months ago, making the connection is very unreliable though, so i hope the Chromecast can improve this.
A general thing is that as more and more devices become "smart" in terms of features and protocols etc, it becomes more and more apparent to me how bad the software is on many of these devices. My TV and my router are just some recent examples of buggy firmwares on top of very good hardware. The router supports lots of features like DLNA and VPN which can hardly be called stable and the interface and usability is really dated. Hardware and performance (Netgear R7000 Gigabit Wifi Router) is pretty awesome though.
I think there's a huge startup opportunity somewhere in building reliable, stable router software with a slick webinterface built in Bootstrap (without framesets).
Of course, there's the Apple Airports that have excellent stability and UI, and while I have one and far better than any router I've owned, it doesn't do stuff like VPN.
We have always been using AShot successfully till now, though the name is misleading, it basically streams the Android screen to your laptop, try it http://sourceforge.net/projects/ashot/
I've tried ChromeCast with my Ubuntu. It works perfectly. Even screen mirroring, while friends on OS X had problems with it. Just check for Chrome extension.
My Chromecast doesn't work too great due to my router, but I'm hopeful that it will once they release the feature that removes the need for the Chromecast and casting device to be on the same network.
It DOES NOT however not work on bad wifis and networks. Verify you your router configuration (there's tons of routers that block multicast over Wifi by default which doesn't work well with Chromecast) and wifi network quality.
You bought a smartphone of 130 $, so you have a low-end phone.
Want a smartphone, buy whatever you want. Want a decent one, spend more then 299 $ ( current situation / most cases ).
I come accross enough discussions, where someone bought the cheapest smartphone and always wants the latest features. Just didn't think it would be here also...
[1] says that support for other devices is coming soon. Given that Motorola is at the moment still Google, runs nearly vanilla Android, and is usually quick to get new features, I wouldn't be surprised if at least the Moto G and X get this soon as well.
The Moto E is really a low-end device, with a relatively weak CPU, so I wouldn't expect too much at all. Of course, having a Chromecast is still great for apps that support Chromecast.
Does it bring up a phone and display apps as they would appear on a phone? Or do you just get a fullscreen, list of apps etc? I just basically want a bigger, 1 to 1 direct display of my phone on the screen for demonstrating and testing apps. Anyone know if this is possible with Chromecast?
The use cases they list (images and google maps) are great for static or slow loading sources. Does this work for video? Can I stream video that's playing on my phone to the Chromecast and have it look decent? Because that'd be amazing and I would be extremely happy!
I've not yet seen a consumer device were video rendering is done on one device then displayed wirelessly on another that works well at all. (Note, most Chromcast apps - Netflix etc) just tell the Chromecast what to play and it does the rendering.
KitKat really should have been released for the device before official support was discontinued. I kind of feel fleeced given it was a flagship Nexus device (for Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich!)
I believe there were a couple problems; the SoC manufacturer getting out of the SoC business (TI) made driver development difficult, and the fact that the image didn't fit in the Galaxy Nexus's flash anyway.
Though it does appear that CynaogenMod eventually ported ICS, so I could be wrong.
Reminds me of www.tinystic.com ,Tinystic promises to deliver the same thing and allow you to use your phone as a computer, video game, movie playing device, etc.
Well that kinda takes the wind out of the sails of the cyanogenmod peeps. I wonder what the quality is. Anyone know if it will have decent frame rates?
I'm confused... this feature has been available in CM11 nightlies for at least a month now (Nexus 4 here).
Frame rate seems good enough for YouTube, though audio stopped working (didn't get sent to the ChromeCast, and wouldn't play on the device either) while the video was playing.
There is a slight lag with Chromecast mirroring. A HDMI adapter (MHL/Slimport/etc) with a wireless controller (I use a PS3 controller) is still going to be a better option.
Android has had it for quite some time also if you have a smart tv with dlna support(most of the newer ones). What's new is the support in chromecast. Does the ios solution work with any smart tv or do you need an airplay?
Android has had Miracast support (with display mirroring) for a while now...just nobody used it. Chromecast is/has the potential to be a much more widely used and supported protocol.
sandesh247|11 years ago
Edit: Yep, restarting did the trick. Have media apps without Chromecast support suddenly become Chromecast capable? This is pretty awesome.
Edit 2: Why yes, yes they have! Now if only I could stream audio only ...
matt_heimer|11 years ago
notatoad|11 years ago
kayoone|11 years ago
A general thing is that as more and more devices become "smart" in terms of features and protocols etc, it becomes more and more apparent to me how bad the software is on many of these devices. My TV and my router are just some recent examples of buggy firmwares on top of very good hardware. The router supports lots of features like DLNA and VPN which can hardly be called stable and the interface and usability is really dated. Hardware and performance (Netgear R7000 Gigabit Wifi Router) is pretty awesome though.
fredsted|11 years ago
Of course, there's the Apple Airports that have excellent stability and UI, and while I have one and far better than any router I've owned, it doesn't do stuff like VPN.
fenomas|11 years ago
(serious question)
delbel|11 years ago
avighnay|11 years ago
fakeyfake|11 years ago
vidarh|11 years ago
Zikes|11 years ago
https://fbcdn-video-a.akamaihd.net/hvideo-ak-xfp1/v/t43.1792...
hughdbrown|11 years ago
Pawka|11 years ago
jfoster|11 years ago
My Chromecast doesn't work too great due to my router, but I'm hopeful that it will once they release the feature that removes the need for the Chromecast and casting device to be on the same network.
izacus|11 years ago
It DOES NOT however not work on bad wifis and networks. Verify you your router configuration (there's tons of routers that block multicast over Wifi by default which doesn't work well with Chromecast) and wifi network quality.
jahmed|11 years ago
rahimnathwani|11 years ago
I can't use Google Cardboard because the device doesn't have the sensors to detect movement or the magnetic 'tap'.
I can't use GoShow (which seems to be the most popular app for watching 3D video) because it crashes.
Today I finally had a reason to buy a Chromecast, until I saw no Moto devices are on the list of supported devices.
:(
NicoJuicy|11 years ago
Want a smartphone, buy whatever you want. Want a decent one, spend more then 299 $ ( current situation / most cases ).
I come accross enough discussions, where someone bought the cheapest smartphone and always wants the latest features. Just didn't think it would be here also...
microtonal|11 years ago
The Moto E is really a low-end device, with a relatively weak CPU, so I wouldn't expect too much at all. Of course, having a Chromecast is still great for apps that support Chromecast.
[1] https://support.google.com/chromecast/answer/6059461
GotAnyMegadeth|11 years ago
tone|11 years ago
SixSigma|11 years ago
It is a direct mirror of the screen scaled up.
The Chromecast is twice the price.
I use mainly it to watch YouTube stuff with my gran when I visit her.
lelandbatey|11 years ago
mikeryan|11 years ago
I've not yet seen a consumer device were video rendering is done on one device then displayed wirelessly on another that works well at all. (Note, most Chromcast apps - Netflix etc) just tell the Chromecast what to play and it does the rendering.
someperson|11 years ago
KitKat really should have been released for the device before official support was discontinued. I kind of feel fleeced given it was a flagship Nexus device (for Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich!)
jrockway|11 years ago
Though it does appear that CynaogenMod eventually ported ICS, so I could be wrong.
segmondy|11 years ago
nospecinterests|11 years ago
kelnos|11 years ago
Frame rate seems good enough for YouTube, though audio stopped working (didn't get sent to the ChromeCast, and wouldn't play on the device either) while the video was playing.
laichzeit0|11 years ago
matt_heimer|11 years ago
sreyaNotfilc|11 years ago
matt_heimer|11 years ago
ericflo|11 years ago
nb1981|11 years ago
nnutter|11 years ago
Too|11 years ago
chambo622|11 years ago
NicoJuicy|11 years ago