I actually think this is pretty cool. I know I tend to jump from cnn.com to bbc.co.uk to espn.com to velonews.com so it would be cool to have a quick way to do this.
I second that question. I browsed through some of the articles but fail to see the appeal. Technically it's a nice little trick but usability-wise I can't see myself using this.
You and others agreeing with you are making the (self-centered) mistake of assuming that you are the market.
You are not.
As they indicate in the about page Google intends the target to be people who flip through magazines and when they see a title that interests them or a picture of someone they recognize they then read the article.
Whether that market exists or will be the actual market (if any) of this "product" remains to be seen.
In summary: I can barely read even the important text (titles, headlines), therefore this is of little use to me. I agree with others: I'd get a lot more out of being presented just clickable titles and headlines in a legible font size; and we already have that in several forms. Showing thumbnails of full-page screenshots is just a waste of screen real estate.
A few years ago I was playing with Web page screenshots and thinking it'd be a big deal. Some sites like DZone even got in on the action pretty quick and.. after all that time, I just can't see it having added value. It looks good but in terms of usability, I've found it adds little for me over time. Any studies been done into this usability wise?
[+] [-] dfranke|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adamhowell|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thaumaturgy|16 years ago|reply
EDIT: Hah. Plus "like" and the mobile UI -- that pretty much is 80% of our client interface.
[+] [-] JacobAldridge|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shotgun|16 years ago|reply
What I find interesting is that you and I are both working on a journalism/publishing startup and found reason to use similar UI ideas.
We must be onto something!
[+] [-] bjclark|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mshafrir|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sjs|16 years ago|reply
If you were asking more generally, see this discussion[1] on the WebKit mailing list, and these Qt links[2, 3] that I found in that thread.
[1] http://www.nabble.com/Webkit-capture-web-page-content-API-td...
[2] http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2008/11/03/thumbnail-preview...
[3] http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2009/01/15/capturing-web-pag...
[+] [-] mcantelon|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] txxxxd|16 years ago|reply
I can zoom through articles pressing the left/right arrows with no perceptible latency.
[+] [-] moe|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] KWD|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] njharman|16 years ago|reply
You are not.
As they indicate in the about page Google intends the target to be people who flip through magazines and when they see a title that interests them or a picture of someone they recognize they then read the article.
Whether that market exists or will be the actual market (if any) of this "product" remains to be seen.
[+] [-] adamhowell|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] axod|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Eliezer|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] slig|16 years ago|reply
edit: nevermind. Now I see the left scroll pane.
[+] [-] Pistos2|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chaosmachine|16 years ago|reply
If there was some way to keep them interactive, it'd be even more interesting.
[+] [-] jrbedard|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ssn|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] petercooper|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cpr|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] riobard|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mattparcher|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] budwin|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cmars232|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JBiserkov|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joez|16 years ago|reply
"Swipe left and right to move between articles. Stretch & pinch or rotate the phone to zoom in and out."
[+] [-] jongraehl|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] omarish|16 years ago|reply