We had this exact same thing happen when we bought funeral services for my (late) older brother. They asked us for a bunch of pictures of him and some of his favorite music to use in a slideshow they were preparing as part of the funeral package.
We have everyone at the service, in the pews and settled in. The lights dim, a projector screen rolls down and music starts to play. His music. Their slideshow was not exactly a slideshow, but an automatically generated remembrance DVD. It started with a flyover of some nature/rambling rivers and then rose into the air into parting clouds.
So far so good.
The DVD was an interspersing of stock nature footage and pictures of my brother. Face recognition algorithms were used to find where he was in each picture and slowly 'zoom' into them, or pan over to center on him. I think basically so that there was some sort of movement to the pictures.
But their software (or more likely the software they had licensed) hadn't gotten his face right. Instead it kept zooming in on family members and (tragically) cutting him out. Instead it zoomed in constantly on my sister. It was obvious that either the software didn't have a way to correct such errors, or that the funeral home hadn't bothered to preview the DVD before making it a part of the service.
I work on slideshow creation software for funeral homes. Stories like yours are something I worry quite a bit about, since we've found that once users trust our software, they stop bothering with the preview.
We let the user choose custom zoom points but don't yet incorporate face recognition. As far as I am aware, none of our competitors have face recognition or even face detection.
Some funeral homes hire or outsource to a local videographer instead of using purpose-built software. It's possible that the videographer could have used a slideshow plugin with that feature and then combined it with the stock footage.
Facebook is racist against fat bald guys with beards and assumes we all look the same, because it's always suggesting I'm one of the other random fat bald guy with a beard I know.
(Actually, after going through a lot of bogus suggestions over the course of a few months and correcting them, it's a lot better. But the joke doesn't work as well this way.)
You mean that if I eat more, groom a mightier beard and, ahem... wait for my hair loss to run its course, I will be immune to the spook-industrial-complex's tracking?
This is likely caused by the age difference, and the fact that they probably have some overlapping friends, even if it's not just one another. I'd have to guess the way it works is that Facebook looks at the poster, the poster's friends, and maybe the poster's friends of friends for a decent match among them when it encounters an untagged person. He probably scored higher because he does look like her, and those pictures are quite old and lack features that his mother currently has, such as wrinkles.
Same here. But then again, my wife and I do sometimes tag photos of our children with each others name to draw attention to a picture posted when the other is not there. (I'm not sure I explained that clearly but I see people do this a lot so I assume everyone knows what I'm talking about.) I would imagine that confuses FB's algorithm a bit as well.
Just yesterday there was a story on HN about 23andMe where a guy discovered he had a half brother but 23andMe tagged him has potentially his grandfather.
[+] [-] xnull|11 years ago|reply
We have everyone at the service, in the pews and settled in. The lights dim, a projector screen rolls down and music starts to play. His music. Their slideshow was not exactly a slideshow, but an automatically generated remembrance DVD. It started with a flyover of some nature/rambling rivers and then rose into the air into parting clouds.
So far so good.
The DVD was an interspersing of stock nature footage and pictures of my brother. Face recognition algorithms were used to find where he was in each picture and slowly 'zoom' into them, or pan over to center on him. I think basically so that there was some sort of movement to the pictures.
But their software (or more likely the software they had licensed) hadn't gotten his face right. Instead it kept zooming in on family members and (tragically) cutting him out. Instead it zoomed in constantly on my sister. It was obvious that either the software didn't have a way to correct such errors, or that the funeral home hadn't bothered to preview the DVD before making it a part of the service.
[+] [-] jewel|11 years ago|reply
We let the user choose custom zoom points but don't yet incorporate face recognition. As far as I am aware, none of our competitors have face recognition or even face detection.
Some funeral homes hire or outsource to a local videographer instead of using purpose-built software. It's possible that the videographer could have used a slideshow plugin with that feature and then combined it with the stock footage.
[+] [-] IvyMike|11 years ago|reply
(Actually, after going through a lot of bogus suggestions over the course of a few months and correcting them, it's a lot better. But the joke doesn't work as well this way.)
[+] [-] crpatino|11 years ago|reply
You mean that if I eat more, groom a mightier beard and, ahem... wait for my hair loss to run its course, I will be immune to the spook-industrial-complex's tracking?
Pass the burgers, please!!!
[+] [-] skrebbel|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] blueflow|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bagels|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|11 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] laoba|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jack-r-abbit|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ejain|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jack-r-abbit|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rglovejoy|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sebastianavina|11 years ago|reply