top | item 8329258 (no title) lunchbox | 11 years ago Just curious, what risk are you referring to? discuss order hn newest jacquesm|11 years ago One person knowing the identities of all your spies? That's a huge violation of the compartimentalization principle.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_%28informa...Of course you could say there was a 'need to know' but at a minimum there should have been many 'Fifi's', and preferably ones that did not come from occupied territory. praptak|11 years ago Also there's the "never follow patterns" principle. Interrogate enough spies and you might figure out they have been checked by the same person. unknown|11 years ago [deleted] lunchbox|11 years ago Ah OK thanks!
jacquesm|11 years ago One person knowing the identities of all your spies? That's a huge violation of the compartimentalization principle.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_%28informa...Of course you could say there was a 'need to know' but at a minimum there should have been many 'Fifi's', and preferably ones that did not come from occupied territory. praptak|11 years ago Also there's the "never follow patterns" principle. Interrogate enough spies and you might figure out they have been checked by the same person. unknown|11 years ago [deleted] lunchbox|11 years ago Ah OK thanks!
praptak|11 years ago Also there's the "never follow patterns" principle. Interrogate enough spies and you might figure out they have been checked by the same person.
jacquesm|11 years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_%28informa...
Of course you could say there was a 'need to know' but at a minimum there should have been many 'Fifi's', and preferably ones that did not come from occupied territory.
praptak|11 years ago
unknown|11 years ago
[deleted]
lunchbox|11 years ago