This is really cool, also check out http://www.openworm.org/ which was started around the same time. I wish there was a comparison of the two projects.
These projects are amazing, and I only wish I knew about them a few years earlier. I studied C. elegans quite a bit when I was in school, and I also worked with D. melanogaster for a genetics project. I wonder how OpenWorm will help shape research in the years to come as it matures. It's a really nice surprise to see useful, open software that it so pertinent to the things I spent so much time studying - I hope I can still reach the people who picked up on my old projects and share these tools with them.
This is really cool. The other fruit fly project I was impressed by recently was Mihir Garimella's FlyBot: Mimicking Fruit Fly Response Patterns for Threat Evasion [1] which was a quadcopter that demonstrated evasive behavior. I really like looking at biomimicry implementations because there are so many levels on which to do it. Mimir was trying to mimic outwardly observable behavior while Neurokernel is trying to mimic neural pathways.
Please note that while interesting in the context of a 14-year old executing it (under heavy supervision, I suspect based on the trajectory model), the translation from fly or bee to robot has been done for almost thirty years on a much larger scale. If you're interested, check out the work of Srinivasan, Borst, or this cool piece of engineering:
This is very important. When people talk about emulating/uploading human brains, they extrapolate computing power and scanning to a point ~2040 when we will have the capability. But guess what, we have the capacity to upload a roundworm now or a fly and have tried to, and we cannot.
Wy?
it seems that there is something we are missing and most likely it's the science.
tl;dr we need to understand brains better before we can upload a human or a fly, this kind of project will get us there.
I would be more impressed by your argument if these projects seemed to have any support or real energy behind them besides a handful of hobbyists and grad students. There's snake oil with far more funding and backing than these projects.
As far as I understand, the endgame of this stuff is a piece of software which would make a robot that was an exact physical equivalent of a fly without a brain behave exactly as a real fly does, assuming we had the computing power to run it in real time. Are these projects actually going for that, or do they have some more modest goal for what they expect to achieve, say, before 2020?
This project is a threat to the Linux kernel. Matthew Garrett may become interested again in fruit flies and stop finding and fixing the moist weird bugs in the ACPI/PM implementation of Linux.
[+] [-] coconutrandom|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LowDog|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wicker|11 years ago|reply
[1] https://www.googlesciencefair.com/projects/en/2014/6d1893c20...
[+] [-] apl|11 years ago|reply
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v497/n7447/full/nature1...
[+] [-] wassyape|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gwern|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rsaarelm|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] juliangamble|11 years ago|reply
"Brain in a Dish Flies Plane" http://news.discovery.com/tech/robotics/brain-dish-flies-pla...
[+] [-] gioele|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] oscargrouch|11 years ago|reply
Maybe we should blame the GPU folks for switching from "shader " to "kernel" for general computing shaders instead?
[+] [-] paulvs|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] p1esk|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|11 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] _red|11 years ago|reply