(no title)
cal2
|
11 years ago
I find it very mildly ironic that the author is comparing these "ancient" versions to MacPorts. Am I naïve, or do the overwhelming majority of OS X developers use Homebrew nowadays? I've always thought Homebrew to be much more robust than MacPorts. However, I've never actually used MacPorts heavily (and probably never will).
msluyter|11 years ago
weaksauce|11 years ago
The format is really simple and powerful.
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/For...
More complex example:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/6a72fa26aa49ee5c2b...
Edit:
If that's the only reason you can't use homebrew just, you can just tap another cask with it in there(or whatever they are calling that process).
https://github.com/avalanche123/homebrew-rpmbuild
cal2|11 years ago
D4AHNGM|11 years ago
GuiA|11 years ago
mbreese|11 years ago
I try to not muck around with the base installs too much - it makes it too difficult to migrate between machines.
D4AHNGM|11 years ago
Homebrew actually merged in 4 unique bash patches in 6 days after Shellshock broke as well, and forced all users to recompile to ensure that hole was closed on our end. The author of this article would have probably been best checking both MacPorts and Homebrew, and potentially Fink as well.
shurcooL|11 years ago
dilap|11 years ago
anoother|11 years ago