top | item 8556509

Woz’s take on the Apple 1’s noisy -5 volt supply

223 points| fogus | 11 years ago |willegal.net | reply

61 comments

order
[+] jaysonelliot|11 years ago|reply
My favorite quote from Woz's reply is this:

"I awoke one night in Quito, Ecuador, this year and came up with a way to save a chip or two from the Apple II, and a trivial way to have the 2 grays of the Apple II be different (light gray and dark gray) but it’s 38 years too late."

This is how you know you love your work. When you're still thinking of new things you can optimize, even four decades later.

[+] jgrahamc|11 years ago|reply
I would buy Woz's improved Apple ][ if he started selling them.
[+] melling|11 years ago|reply
Why is that cool? There's no doubt that Woz brilliant. However, I wish he had a second act. That he would come out with some sort of cool wearable or something else.

Steve Jobs kept trying to invent the next big thing. Apple II, Macintosh, NeXT, iPod, iPhone. For some reason, engineers often don't think like this

[+] rbanffy|11 years ago|reply
Indeed.

If he describes the two grays thing in more detail, someone could implement it in MESS at least.

Woz: are you reading this?

[+] alexose|11 years ago|reply
)

Don't worry-- I closed the unclosed parenthesis.

[+] BigTuna|11 years ago|reply
When you read responses like this it's impossible not to be in awe of the guy. He's a great role model for newer generations both in his passion for his work and his top-notch personality.
[+] Danieru|11 years ago|reply
I want to hear how he'd do the gray thing, it sounds interesting.
[+] Siecje|11 years ago|reply
There is a comment on the page that touches on it.
[+] nagarjun|11 years ago|reply
Fantastic to see how humble he is with his response. He could have easily said "that's how it was done back then and it was really the best thing out there" but, he didn't. The stuff of legend.
[+] boxcardavin|11 years ago|reply
Woz is such a cool guy, he reminds a lot of startup guys of how much pure fun tech was when you were 8-15yrs old and not thinking about money.
[+] jamesaguilar|11 years ago|reply
Hi, I've been trying to figure this out for a while, and it's a hell of a thing to get Google to understand. Can someone explain why the rail is referred to as "-5v" instead of its opposite simply being called "5v"?
[+] pjc50|11 years ago|reply
Because it's 5V below the "ground"/0V rail which most things are referenced to. It's very inconvenient to keep referring to the 17V rail and the 10V rail above the 5V return rail, so you call those 12V, 5V and 0V. The majority return current is in the 0V rail. The -5V rail supplies (conventional) current which also returns to the 0V rail.

(In fact there is usually very little current in the -5V rail, just leakage through transistors; it's used as a bias voltage for the DRAM substrate. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TgW3LTubREQC&pg=PA158&lpg... )

[+] rrmm|11 years ago|reply
The power supply output 12, 5, -5, -12 volts. -5v rail was for the DRAM.
[+] raverbashing|11 years ago|reply
Yes, there's always something to optimize, but also shipping is needed.

I'm not sure what the -5v was used on, but apparently it wasn't a huge issue.

It doesn't matter anymore. It matters what you can learn with it.

[+] RankingMember|11 years ago|reply
There's a guy who genuinely lives/breathes electronics.