Author here. It's funny, I actually didn't even know about HoneySQL when I made this. It was only after that someone pointed it out to me that I saw how similar our libraries are.
It believe it says something really good about this approach that we both came to such a similar conclusion independently.
I think OJ takes a slightly more minimalistic approach. I would say that my specification is a little more precise as well. Maybe in the future the author of HoneySQL and I can collaborate.
+1 - This is by far the sanest approach to rdbms interaction I've seen. It's kind of sad that we're stuck with SQL but while we're stuck with it we should stick to it. :P
taylorlapeyre|11 years ago
It believe it says something really good about this approach that we both came to such a similar conclusion independently.
I think OJ takes a slightly more minimalistic approach. I would say that my specification is a little more precise as well. Maybe in the future the author of HoneySQL and I can collaborate.
kyllo|11 years ago
handojin|11 years ago