top | item 8607250

Ruby 2.1.5 Released

92 points| reledi | 11 years ago |ruby-lang.org | reply

34 comments

order
[+] thinkbohemian|11 years ago|reply
If you're still running a Ruby 2.1.0, 2.1.1, or 2.1.2 (i.e. less than 2.1.3) you're missing out on some killer memory optimizations. I saw huge savings in my production app when i bumped from 2.1.2 to 2.1.3.

Also 2.1.5 is available on Heroku: https://devcenter.heroku.com/changelog

Think HN is loosing its touch. It's been on Reddit for over 24 hours: http://www.reddit.com/r/ruby/comments/2m6p6n/ruby_215_is_rel.... Anywhoo, glad for the publicity, please upgrade your Rubies.

[+] sergiotapia|11 years ago|reply
From experience expect to see a lot of heroku memory errors if you're using anything above 2.0.0.

Heroku supports these newer ruby versions but they trigger memory errors like it's nobodies business.

2.0.0 means no memory errors.

[+] anonyfox|11 years ago|reply
> Think HN is loosing its touch.

Or the interest in ruby is just fading. Every single developer I know in my area just moved on from ruby, the only thing to do is maintaining some rails 2/3 apps built several years ago.

[+] crohr|11 years ago|reply
For anyone interested, DEB and RPM packages are available at https://packager.io/gh/pkgr/rubies for various distributions. For instance for ubuntu 14.04: https://packager.io/gh/pkgr/rubies/install?bid=28#ubuntu-14-...
[+] stewbrew|11 years ago|reply
Wouldn't one rather want to use rvm?
[+] Tomte|11 years ago|reply
My interest in Ruby wanes a bit every time there is a new Ruby release, but no corresponding Windows installer on rubyinstaller.org

I really like the language and used to reach for it as a first instinct, but nowadays it almost lost its mindshare with me.

I understand that there are open bugs that are tricky, but I get the very serious impression that the core Ruby devs simply don't care about Windows at all (a bit like it used to be with git). Bad move, I think.

[+] vectorpush|11 years ago|reply
You seem a little entitled. This may not be politically correct, but frankly, Ruby is nix style software, Windows support seems like its just a courtesy.

Perhaps I'm living in a linux-nerd bubble, but why would anyone even use ruby when targeting the Windows platform? Seems like .NET would be a more appropriate choice across the board (be it for web or Windows application development).

I can't imagine the type of pain involved in deploying Ruby code into production in a Windows environment, that just seems insane. This is all to say, maybe Ruby isn't the best choice for a Windows developer. If one simply enjoys the Windows experience in general, at the very least, if I were developing Ruby in Windows, I'd expect to use a *nix VM via SSH thru cygwin or something.

[+] spleen|11 years ago|reply
The Ruby for Windows build is maintained by enthusiasts and is usually available within a day or two.

Nothing too alarming, since v2.1.4 is available: http://rubyinstaller.org/downloads/

[+] adrianlmm|11 years ago|reply
I'm stick to Ruby 1.9.3 on Windows, Ruby 2.1.4 can be installed, but some important Gems won't work, so I cannot install Sinatra for example.

So, I cannot stay like this, I like Ruby, but I cannot be at the mercy of their lack of attention for Windows, so, as soon Asp.Net MVC 6 is released I'm going to migrate my Sinatra web App to Asp MVC 6.

[+] k-mcgrady|11 years ago|reply
Haven't developed on Windows in years but is there no package manager you can access via the command line or is an installer necessary?
[+] jesalg|11 years ago|reply
Just use Vagrant. It's so much easier.
[+] barbudorojo|11 years ago|reply
not a big deal here, fixed a DoS vulnerability of REXML, and some small bug fixes, textually: Sorry for the inconvenience of frequent releases.