There is a good case for delaying the release of the data to give the associated researchers a chance to write their papers, theses, etc. A lot of groundwork has to be laid to get one of these experiments constructed, and it wouldn't be right for the ones who did that work to be jumped by an outside group, who might then receive credit for a discovery. After some time though, the data definitely needs to be opened up. It belongs to everyone, and there is no good in keeping it behind a wall forever.
I think this is great; the transition to open data in Big Science will be slow, but it's clearly the right thing to do.
That being said, the biggest short-term practical consequence of this will be a stream of disturbed pseudo-scientists "discovering" things in the data.
>That being said, the biggest short-term practical consequence of this will be a stream of disturbed pseudo-scientists "discovering" things in the data.
So? Those guys have been doing that for ages already. OTOH, don't be surprised if some actual discoveries/improvements happen now, given more open access to the data.
[+] [-] dalek2point3|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fnordfnordfnord|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] noobermin|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] noobermin|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] milliams|11 years ago|reply
Also PyROOT (http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/pyroot) or the newer rootpy (http://www.rootpy.org/) really help.
[+] [-] tenfingers|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cozzyd|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pinko|11 years ago|reply
That being said, the biggest short-term practical consequence of this will be a stream of disturbed pseudo-scientists "discovering" things in the data.
[+] [-] fnordfnordfnord|11 years ago|reply
So? Those guys have been doing that for ages already. OTOH, don't be surprised if some actual discoveries/improvements happen now, given more open access to the data.