(no title)
al_bundling | 11 years ago
It very much does. It gives you a sense of real world marginal costs, a fair assessment of fair market value (fair retail cost = reasonable markup factor * wholesale cost) and a sense of scale.
> If an average coder can't even get bandwidth at $0.001/GB with some serious effort,
If I can, you can. I've even given examples with links to order pages. Not that I recommend FDCservers, mind you.
> then how this this a valid point of comparison for how much bandwidth should cost for the average internet user?
It's a valid point because it tells you how much bandwidth ACTUALLY costs compared to what Comcast says it costs.
> I doubt you can get Level3 or Internap to beat HE prices.
How much money do you have on you? There's a bet I'd like to win.
codexon|11 years ago
Commit to a single DC is not the same thing as metered bandwidth to thousands of customers.
- Running fiber to a DC is way easier than running it house that could be in the middle of nowhere.
- Commit != selling bandwidth by the byte. I think you fail to understand this. I don't have the time to explain this in detail to you anymore as I've already spent more time than I wanted to writing the rest of this.
> If I can, you can. I've even given examples with links to order pages. Not that I recommend FDCservers, mind you.
Uh still wrong, and not even close even if you include FDCservers.
1GBPS $2500/328717GB = $0.007/GB
10GBPS $15000/3287170GB = $0.004/GB
Where's the $0.001/GB?
A page asking you to contact their sales team is not an example. If you are buying transit you need to be in the proper DC and you need to colo. This is out of reach for most programmers that deploy on EC2 or Digital Ocean.
> How much money do you have on you? There's a bet I'd like to win.
You're probably going to make another flawed comparison that you can get tier 1 bandwidth lower than HE by buying some absurd amount of commit. Feel free to prove me wrong with actual quotes.
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpost.php?s=8394951450d19c2...