It's impressive how much less influential TechCrunch has become. To me, it's pretty clear that the main reason is the sheer number of articles they publish every day. Even if the overall audience is very large, the audience for each article isn't so high. On the plus side, the people who read articles self-select and are by definition interested in the topic, so the conversion rate in the end is higher. Bottom line: with TC, you reach a wide audience and extract the few that are relevant to your product.
Let's just say that 6 years ago when I launched on TC, the traffic numbers were much higher.
You're absolutely right. It's interesting to see that more and more journalists focus on number of clics / views, vs actual engagement. I guess short term metrics like clics / views are one way to go, but definitely not a good one for journalism on the long term.
> [HN] ... get some friends to upvote the link early on, but don’t be tempted to try and game the voting system.
I'm puzzled by the idea that setting up an ad hoc voting ring (apparently with careful planning, as per the description on how to maximize the quality of the fraudulent clicks) is somehow not gaming the system.
So you're not just a "sarcastic tech blog commentator", but also a harsh blog post commentator :) But you're right. Removed it. Thx for reading til the end.
[+] [-] alain94040|11 years ago|reply
Let's just say that 6 years ago when I launched on TC, the traffic numbers were much higher.
[+] [-] alexeichemenda|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jsnell|11 years ago|reply
I'm puzzled by the idea that setting up an ad hoc voting ring (apparently with careful planning, as per the description on how to maximize the quality of the fraudulent clicks) is somehow not gaming the system.
[+] [-] minimaxir|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] SimonDawlat|11 years ago|reply