(no title)
tgeek
|
11 years ago
there are languages inside of Amazon that are first class citizens (java & ruby mostly, node.js more now). Go is too new, moving too fast, and hasn't seen the same kind of adoption yet to warrant an SDK.(despite what the folks here might think..)
andrewstuart|11 years ago
Companies that provide programmable systems should be the first to provide SDK's, even for technologies not yet widely adopted. That goes for any company that provides something programmable.
Amazon appears to have no trouble at all justifying the massive development effort required for every new back end web service they build, but front end programming API access just isn't valued as much.
nl|11 years ago
Honestly, is that really a surprise at all?
REST web services work well. Most languages have frameworks with excellent support for them.
Historically, the community has provided wrappers for popular APIs pretty quickly.
In the specific case of Go, it's still in early adopter territory. That means they are unlikely to have a problem using the raw APIs.
threeseed|11 years ago
Their back end services make them money. Creating a Go API does not.
Makes it hard to justify investing development resources.
codahale|11 years ago
I did this in rough a week and a half of full-time work.
andrewstuart|11 years ago
sciurus|11 years ago
http://aws.amazon.com/ecs/
justicezyx|11 years ago
[deleted]