(no title)
Martijn | 11 years ago
If I had to leave out the answer type of questions, I'd have to come up with an entirely different way of modelling answers. For example, I might have had to write a datatype like:
data Answer = AnswerBool Bool | AnswerInt Int | ...
and then processing the answer (through pattern matching) would have to discard any answer it didn't like, which is awkward. Or I would have had to use a type class to keep everything type-safe which would have resulted in more complicated type signatures throughout the code.For the TargetList, the current setup allows me to write functions that consume a target list of exactly the right size, for example:
\(target1, target2) -> ...
rather than a normal list: \[target1, target2] -> ...
which in this case results in a pattern match exception if you pass it a list of any length other than 2.
No comments yet.