top | item 8924672

(no title)

thomaslutz | 11 years ago

Does not work for iOS yet? Edit: "At this time, WhatsApp Web is available only for Android, Windows Phone, Nokia S60, BlackBerry and BB10 smartphones." https://www.whatsapp.com/faq/en/web/28080003

discuss

bolix|11 years ago

"Unfortunately for now, we will not be able to provide web client to our iOS users due to Apple platform limitations." http://blog.whatsapp.com/614/WhatsApp-Web

balls187|11 years ago

<del>Assumption: WhatsApp for iOS is in the 5 business day App Store approval queue.</del>

josu|11 years ago

"Unfortunately for now, we will not be able to provide web client to our iOS users due to Apple platform limitations."

And even if they could, I'd doubt that they'd make Facebook wait 5 days for their app to be aproved.

Mikeb85|11 years ago

Apple's browser is probably lacking necessary features. They have been much slower adopting features than the competition.

danielhunt|11 years ago

It's not the browser ... the iOS app doesn't yet have the capability to scan the QR code to link your account to the website

wklauss|11 years ago

> They have been much slower adopting features than the competition.

It's not a matter of speed. This seems to be using WebRTC for handling communications between the phone app and the browser. Safari has chosen not to implement WebRTC and so far it is still not a proper standard so I can see why. Google, as the developer of WebRTC, will obviously support it right away. Note that no browser other than Chrome can be used as well.

jamesrom|11 years ago

Wait, you know that WebKit is spearheaded by Apple? And that there's two completely unrelated problems here:

1. The frontend only works on Chrome for desktop (it appears only because it uses the non-standards track filesystem API)

2. The backend service and mobile app does not work with iOS (it appears because it uses background networking)

They may seem related, but they aren't.

mattnewton|11 years ago

That doesn't seem likely to me: what features does iOS not have right now, that this is likely to use? It seems more likely if they are targeting chrome only they did it to avoid the support overhead of making it work in multiple browsers.