top | item 909602

Srinivasa Ramanujan

77 points| vinutheraj | 16 years ago |en.wikipedia.org | reply

48 comments

order
[+] travisjeffery|16 years ago|reply
If you count him as unknown then you might as well count just about every other Mathematician other than Newton as an unknown as well.
[+] ciupicri|16 years ago|reply
Not really. Most people know Newton as a physicist, but any pupil knows about Pythagoras. Also, any high school pupil that studies science (not human arts) knows about (Joseph Louis) Lagrange.
[+] eru|16 years ago|reply
And some of the Greeks.
[+] numbchuckskills|16 years ago|reply
agreed..I recall first studying his work in highschool math. and that was in Canada.
[+] Chirag|16 years ago|reply
Ramanujan was also mentioned in "Good Will Hunting". However I do agree that Indians have done a bad in terms of Marketing our selves.

Our brand image over some time has been: Some time Back: Snake Charmers and Kings Now: Bangalore(Outsourcing) & Spicy Food

[+] mahmud|16 years ago|reply
However I do agree that Indians have done a bad in terms of Marketing our selves.

What is this "we", and since when are people brands?

Bit parochial and jingoist eh? Nations are an illusion, and better image "betterment" can be done by caring for one's immediate neighbor.

Don't succumb to regionalist propaganda that serve none other than the ruling classes; all earth is yours, and all (wo)men your kin.

[+] FraaJad|16 years ago|reply
"Snake Charmers" is not a brand image "We" wanted nor created. It is the product of ignorant western minds.

Compared to other eastern cultures (chinese and japanese at least) India has suffered from mis-understanding and underwhelming understanding for a long time.

You only have to read English literature on India from 18 and 19th century to realize the extent of misinformation generated by the British to legitimise their occupation of India. "Victorial Morals" were not helpful either.

[+] ypavan|16 years ago|reply
I loved reading Robert Kanigel's biography - "The Man Who Knew Infinity: A Life of the Genius Ramanujan." Recommended for people who want to know more about the genius mathematician.
[+] muon|16 years ago|reply
The Music of Primes by Marcus Du Sautoy also has an excellent chapter on Ramanujam.
[+] ivenkys|16 years ago|reply
Why is this article at the top of the page ? As so many people have pointed out - he is neither an unknown nor has there been any recent incident/discovery which would require a re-iteration of his "geniusness".
[+] TheElder|16 years ago|reply
White guilt.
[+] chubbard|16 years ago|reply
One of my coworkers used to talk about Ramanujan. He remarked Ramanujan called every prime number a close personal friend. He sort of had this deep relationship with numbers.

Then I saw a documentary on people who could do complex math without the aide of a calculator (e.g. given any large number and tell if it was prime in their head). I thought there might be a parallel between people like this and Ramanujan. The documentary focused on a couple of people who were not savants, but by all accounts normal people. They followed a young British kid. He described how he saw and felt about numbers, and each number had a distinct personality. I found it remarkably similar to the description about how Ramanujan felt about numbers.

[+] zaph0d|16 years ago|reply
[...]Hardy contacted the Indian Office to plan for Ramanujan's trip to Cambridge. Secretary Arthur Davies of the Advisory Committee for Indian Students met with Ramanujan to discuss the overseas trip. In accordance with his Brahmin upbringing, Ramanujan refused to leave his country to "go to a foreign land."

So much for being a Math genius.

Disclaimer: I am an Indian.

[+] gsk|16 years ago|reply
Being a Genius in Mathematics does not necessarily mean being a genius in everything else (including bringing an exciting future forward in time). Galois, another mathematical genius from France (1800s), died at twenty because he fought a duel and got killed. It may be tempting to call him 'stupid'. He may be somewhat irrational in his love affair but that does not make his mathematical genius any lesser.
[+] keeptrying|16 years ago|reply
Newton was supposed to have been an absolute coward.

As a member of parliament the only thing he mentioned, during any session, was a request to open the window.

Feynman was a womanizer who was known to sleep with wives of colleagues. His biography "Genius" is a pretty good read by the way.

Genius doesnt mean "adventurous" or "virtuous" or "worldly". Its just one facet of a human.

[+] andrew1|16 years ago|reply
What does your disclaimer mean?

Ramanujan was a tremendously talented mathematician. Just because you come from the same country as him or find his religious beliefs archaic and/or irrational doesn't mean you can just dismiss his achievements.

[+] muon|16 years ago|reply
Maths and Culture are not related in any way.
[+] wglb|16 years ago|reply
How can you say that the inventor of taxicab numbers is unknown? Most people I know know who he is.
[+] coliveira|16 years ago|reply
This guy was huge, and he is very well known.
[+] ilkhd2|16 years ago|reply
Ramanujan is well known.
[+] eric_t|16 years ago|reply
He is the most well-known "unknown" mathematician...:)
[+] adamc|16 years ago|reply
I think I first read about him in a Martin Gardner book as a kid. So yeah, not that unknown.
[+] capablanca|16 years ago|reply
Well known. Now, do you know Slava Pestov?