I've read a couple of good books recently (Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind by Yuval Noah Harari being my favourite) which make a convincing case for human evolution having mostly finished sometime around 100,000 - 50,000BCE when we homo sapiens started migrating out of Africa. It's pretty amazing to think that there were human beings walking around back then who were at least as mentally developed, if not more, than we are today.
Given the surprise a lot of people have learning their were pre-columbian trade routes from the Arctic to South America, I am not sure we really teach much in the way of history.
Another example, from the article: "there has been other signs of contacts, including bones of domesticated pigs in Germany in Stone Age hunter-gatherer settlements. "There are trade networks that pre-date agriculture,""
> The scientists also found DNA of oak, poplar and beech and of dogs or wolves, deer, grouse and auroch, a type of cow. There was no trace of wheat pollen in the samples, indicating that it was not grown locally.
[+] [-] anarchy8|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rowanseymour|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] protomyth|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] venomsnake|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] markvdb|11 years ago|reply
http://books.google.com/books?id=NAwGLzAfyhEC&printsec=front...
[+] [-] dalke|11 years ago|reply
Regarding the amber trade, see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amber_Road .
[+] [-] kiiski|11 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dalke|11 years ago|reply
There are more details in the review at The Independent . http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/history/the-remarkab... .
[+] [-] shawabawa3|11 years ago|reply
Does that really suggest farming or trade? Couldn't it have just been wild wheat?
[+] [-] dalke|11 years ago|reply
> The scientists also found DNA of oak, poplar and beech and of dogs or wolves, deer, grouse and auroch, a type of cow. There was no trace of wheat pollen in the samples, indicating that it was not grown locally.
[+] [-] unknown|11 years ago|reply
[deleted]