top | item 9139520

(no title)

zep15 | 11 years ago

Do many "otherwise smart" people actually believe "superhuman machine intelligence is prima facie ridiculous"? I'd like to see some citations :-). I think smart people tend to have much more nuanced views.

discuss

order

edmccard|11 years ago

>Do many "otherwise smart" people actually believe "superhuman machine intelligence is prima facie ridiculous"?

I don't know how "otherwise smart" I am, but I wonder how we would be able to tell that a machine intelligence was "superhuman" as opposed to "buggy".

For example, suppose we build a super-AI and ask it, "Is Shinichi Mochizuki's proof of the ABC conjecture correct" [1]. What would we do if it said "yes"?

(Of course, if "superhuman" just means "able to do things humans already know how to do and verify, but lots faster", then we're already there).

[1] http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26753-mathematicians-a...

coderzach|11 years ago

We'd ask it to produce a simplified version.

TeMPOraL|11 years ago

See the reaction of tech industry after Musk donated 10M USD to AI research. It sort of divided into two groups, one saying that it's great choice and another claiming that he's an idiot and AI is a hoax (for the record, I'm in the former group).

NickPollard|11 years ago

Sam's last post on Machine Intelligence, and the worries regarding it, received a lot of dismissal here on HN from people who thought that the idea is completely unfounded and implausible.

wtbob|11 years ago

I am, by most measures, pretty smart, and I agree with Dijkstra that the question of whether a computer can think is as interesting as whether a submarine can swim.

The Strong AI hypothesis assumes a mechanistic universe, if not necessarily a materialistic one, and I think that condition is false.