It may be a south-of-the-equator mentality, but it's not going to be summer in all of the 190 countries when Windows 10 is launched. differing calendars aside could USA-centric press releases just mention the month rather than the season?
They haven't announced a month, and there may be good reasons for that. They may have a target goal in mind, but still want wiggle-room if unexpected issues come up, and 'summer' sounds a heck of a lot better than 'At some point in the months of x and y'
That's really soon, which fills me with dread. The UI as seen in the most recent pre-release builds is atrocious and it seems to be getting worse, not better, with each build.
Perhaps they're pulling another 'Watercolor' (the pre-release decoy Windows XP theme that was replaced by Luna at the last minute), but I'm not getting my hopes up.
You must have a lot of faith in Microsoft when you consider giving up your stable Windows7 in favor a dot zero release of an Operating System that in a lot of way still looks like Windows8.
Unless I can see any kind of track record that it is indeed stable, all the cloud crap can be disabled and they actually put back Themes so I can get rid of everything "modern" or metro or whatever they call this nonsense, I am very happy sticking with 7 for at least the next 5 years.
I think this is as excited as I've been for a Windows release since '95. Which isn't saying a whole lot, but still, this will be the first time I've felt any desire to try upgrading to a new release as soon as it becomes available in 20 years.
Windows 8 works quite well on both of my touch capable laptops, my gaming rig, and old 4-5 year development machine.
With 8.1 the Start button is back, but pressing the Windows key on the keyboard and selecting one of the pinned applications, or typing for search, works perfectly.
It took a while for me to put aside my feeling that things had to stay how they were, but once I did (touch capable device helped) I liked it. A lot.
I hope 10 refines things further. With the cost of touch capable Windows machines so low, the installed OS needs to work.
Edit: and if they can improve startup times even further with 10? Wow. Windows 8 was already faster than 7 on the same machines, even older machines and on non-SSD drives.
Don't get your hopes up, by all accounts 'Windows 10' on the Pi 2 is a special version just for running GUI-less embedded applications. Look at what they have already for the Galileo/Edison (C++ only apps, no GUI) and extrapolate a little bit from there.
The terrible media circus that said Windows 8/10 would run on a Raspberry Pi forgot to mention that it would be the embedded editions of Windows, specifically designed to run IoT-type apps. Not the desktop version.
daemin|11 years ago
AnkhMorporkian|11 years ago
Quppa|11 years ago
Just look at these icons: http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-10-10036-83-updated-icons...
Perhaps they're pulling another 'Watercolor' (the pre-release decoy Windows XP theme that was replaced by Luna at the last minute), but I'm not getting my hopes up.
yuhong|11 years ago
nerdy|11 years ago
1: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2873214/windows-10-will-be-a-...
yaeger|11 years ago
tempestn|11 years ago
james-skemp|11 years ago
http://blogs.windows.com/bloggingwindows/2015/03/17/windows-...
Article linked to is a very brief summary that links to the above.
Urgo|11 years ago
BigChiefSmokem|11 years ago
aceperry|11 years ago
james-skemp|11 years ago
Windows 8 works quite well on both of my touch capable laptops, my gaming rig, and old 4-5 year development machine.
With 8.1 the Start button is back, but pressing the Windows key on the keyboard and selecting one of the pinned applications, or typing for search, works perfectly.
It took a while for me to put aside my feeling that things had to stay how they were, but once I did (touch capable device helped) I liked it. A lot.
I hope 10 refines things further. With the cost of touch capable Windows machines so low, the installed OS needs to work.
Edit: and if they can improve startup times even further with 10? Wow. Windows 8 was already faster than 7 on the same machines, even older machines and on non-SSD drives.
cyberjunkie|11 years ago
tdicola|11 years ago
NeutronBoy|11 years ago