top | item 936154

13 years of CNN.com traffic, visualized

40 points| blasdel | 16 years ago |feltron.tumblr.com | reply

10 comments

order
[+] dolinsky|16 years ago|reply
If I read that visualization correctly, their homepage traffic increased +1000% while the pageviews on specific areas like tech / politics didn't increase at all over the same time span. That's not something I'd be happy about.
[+] brandnewlow|16 years ago|reply
When was the last time you clicked on a category tab on any site?

I can't recall every doing it. I think psychologically we assign very specific use cases to our media. Go here for X. Go there for Y. Go there for Z.

If you go looking for X, it's either there or it's not. You're not going to click on a tab to try and see if that subsection has what you're looking for. You're going to hop to another site that's focused just on doing X.

</gross but perhaps helpful generalization>

[+] Timothee|16 years ago|reply
That's a good point. It probably means that people go to cnn.com to know what's going on, but don't see CNN as the best place to get in-depth or specialized content.
[+] potatolicious|16 years ago|reply
Am I the only one annoyed by all the "retweets, reposts, reblogs" stuff on the bottom? It's twice the length of the original text!

I'm here to read your content, not marvel at your e-dick-size.

[+] unalone|16 years ago|reply
That's Tumblr's equivalent of commenting. I find that it's much more minimal than normal comments, while still letting people respond to the author.

It's not as good, mind you, as showing no response to your work at all and letting it exist in and of itself, but people still use blogs as conversation, and I think reblogging's a much subtler approach to the problem.