This is an interesting story. An unfortunate end.
Most of these things sound like short term issues that get resolved as the tools are made. Alternately Xilinx could have just put the docs out there and said they only support ISE. That way if an open source developer makes a tool they have no responsibility, but can reconsider in a few years in case it gets wide acceptance.
I am not a market strategist, but supporting everyone's custom tool sounds like a quick way to waste money and the wrong way to try and open source something. Similar to respecting every coupon people bring in, even hand written ones.
No comments yet.