top | item 9431068

(no title)

def_illiterate | 11 years ago

>“If Kleiner wanted to look classy, it could have said, ‘This was hard fought and we obviously disagree with your view, but it’s in the interest of all parties to walk away. In the meantime, there have been lessons learned and we are going to fund organizations that focus on glass ceiling issues,’ ” Ms. Katz said.

Just donate to my rainbow coalition...

discuss

order

alexqgb|11 years ago

What they actually said was "Promise not to pursue this case any further or pay us $1 million."

def_illiterate|11 years ago

Yep! And I quoted the article's quote from a critic.

I felt it was worth pointing out one of the most patently ridiculous things I've ever heard, and the fact that it was given play really tells you how the NYT leans.

pyre|11 years ago

> "Promise not to pursue this case any further or we will try to collect $1 million from you"

Fixed that for you. There is no guarantee that they will recover all or part of those costs if they decide to pursue it.