(no title)
possibilistic | 10 years ago
One of these days I guess I could get around to writing a patch. This single feature is probably my most wanted for any software at the moment.
possibilistic | 10 years ago
One of these days I guess I could get around to writing a patch. This single feature is probably my most wanted for any software at the moment.
Cushman|10 years ago
As for "Why would you want this?" For me, the straightforward answer is "modes are modular". A core concept in vim is that your input can be thought of as a string describing the edit you wish to make, and modes help me keep that manageable in my head: I can first think about the mode I plan to enter, and then separately what I plan to do under the constraints of that mode. It's a little hard to explain, and I'm sure acolytes of other paradigms have their own philosophies, but it fits in really well to my workflow.
It's a subtle thing in the limited world of text editing, but I definitely miss the semantics whenever I leave it, whether to a terminal or a browser or whatever. So for me, it comes down to wanting to bring the cost of task switching closer to what it is in the editor.
rsync|10 years ago
Yes, yes they do[1]. Some people (not me) are vehemently, religiously opposed to "modes":
"To promote his preference, as of 2010, Tesler equipped his Subaru automobile with a personalized California license plate with the license number "NO MODES". Along with others, he has also been using the phrase "Don't Mode Me In" for years, as a rally cry to eliminate or reduce modes."
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Tesler
geoka9|10 years ago
jbnicolai|10 years ago
nicm|10 years ago