From the article: "How molecules interact at the quantum level, for example, is difficult to study in a laboratory and impossible to simulate on a classical computer."
Sorry, but that's just flat-out wrong, and this fact is a quick google search away:
"Density functional theory (DFT) is a computational quantum mechanical modelling method used in physics, chemistry and materials science to investigate the electronic structure (principally the ground state) of many-body systems, in particular atoms, molecules, and the condensed phases."[1]
"With this theory, the properties of a many-electron system can be determined by using functionals, i.e. functions of another function, which in this case is the spatially dependent electron density."
The object of study in DFT is the distribution of particles in the system rather than the particles themselves. Which is all well and good, but the article is technically correct in that exactly simulating n-body systems is currently out of reach (in all problem domains) if n is huge.
Also from the article: "A quantum computer could also crack the most sophisticated encryption in use today."
I think this gives the impression that all encryption methods known today fail in the face of a quantum computer. But this is not true. There are a wide array of "post-quantum cryptography algorithms" [1], or encryption schemes thought to be secure against quantum attacks.
I suppose the author might have a particular scheme in mind which he considers the "most sophisticated."
This was a really good science piece by Fast Company. I do wonder how "factors of a prime number" gets by editorial. You don't need a quantum computer to tell you those. :)
Mark Ritter, who oversees scientists and engineers at IBM’s T.J. Watson Research Laboratory, wrote: "I believe we’re entering what will come to be seen as the golden age of quantum computing research."
Golden age of quantum computing research. That's a very different thing from a golden age of quantum computing.
[+] [-] semi-extrinsic|10 years ago|reply
Sorry, but that's just flat-out wrong, and this fact is a quick google search away:
"Density functional theory (DFT) is a computational quantum mechanical modelling method used in physics, chemistry and materials science to investigate the electronic structure (principally the ground state) of many-body systems, in particular atoms, molecules, and the condensed phases."[1]
[1] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_functional_theory
[+] [-] hyperbovine|10 years ago|reply
"With this theory, the properties of a many-electron system can be determined by using functionals, i.e. functions of another function, which in this case is the spatially dependent electron density."
The object of study in DFT is the distribution of particles in the system rather than the particles themselves. Which is all well and good, but the article is technically correct in that exactly simulating n-body systems is currently out of reach (in all problem domains) if n is huge.
[+] [-] mixedmath|10 years ago|reply
I think this gives the impression that all encryption methods known today fail in the face of a quantum computer. But this is not true. There are a wide array of "post-quantum cryptography algorithms" [1], or encryption schemes thought to be secure against quantum attacks.
I suppose the author might have a particular scheme in mind which he considers the "most sophisticated."
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography
[+] [-] kolinko|10 years ago|reply
The best quantum computers can achieve is 2x increase in speed.
[+] [-] appden|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] SoftwareMaven|10 years ago|reply
Golden age of quantum computing research. That's a very different thing from a golden age of quantum computing.