Your comment was initially amusing, but then I did the math and realized how little $15/hour actually is. If someone were able to work the equivalent of full-time, they'd make what? 15 * 40 * 52 = 31,200? Where could you live anywhere near a Facebook office on that? Seattle? Definitely nowhere convenient to their bay area HQ.
$15/hr is a $30k a year FT job. Sure it's not going to make anybody wealthy. But I don't think there are many people making $120k a year commuting on the back of a pickup.
The real issue isn't wages - it's cost of living. If we really want to make people's lives better, we need to address whatever causes prices to increase (limited housing supply is probably the biggest culprit).
For those wondering what this means, it means that a Facebook contractor would still be in the lowest quarter of income earners in Santa Clara County [1]. As such, one would qualify for rental assistance, etc from the county, as the going rate for a /studio/ is $1200/month [2]. The inflated wages of the tech industry have placed an unbearable burden on the average person.
That I would love. Not only did my colleagues generally have less pay, but less privilege and empowerment too. (They'd labor under an abusive-ass boss while I could determine how I best work.) Pretty rotten system we've got.
In Facebook's defense, I doubt they have many minimum wage folks on staff. These are forcing their vendors, cleaning, catering etc. to pay a livable wage (undoubtedly Facebook will pay for this increase however).
Its not something you normally pay attention too. I have a 8 person office in SF that I get cleaned weekly. I have no idea what those individuals are getting paid of the amount I pay to the cleaning service.
[+] [-] PaulHoule|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pyrophane|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wheels|10 years ago|reply
http://rentheatmap.com/sanfrancisco.html
[+] [-] pc86|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] omouse|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] johnrob|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gooseus|10 years ago|reply
I don't know a lot about real estate though.
[+] [-] Sanddancer|10 years ago|reply
[1] http://www.hacsc.org/section-8-housing-programs/waiting-list...
[2] http://www.hacsc.org/section-8-housing-programs/housing-choi...
[+] [-] johnbabboozle|10 years ago|reply
If I looked at actual pay and actual expenses I might agree, but lowest quarter isn't a good argument to make.
[+] [-] someonefromsome|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mliker|10 years ago|reply
Contractors definitely did not receive that before...So that's another key point
[+] [-] nemmonszz|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] csbrooks|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] danbruc|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] johnbabboozle|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] calibraxis|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nashashmi|10 years ago|reply
If that is the situation, why would you pay more than $15/hr.
Also, I wish there was a context of this "minimum pay" policy.
[+] [-] vivab0rg|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] theli0nheart|10 years ago|reply
[1]: http://money.cnn.com/2015/02/19/news/companies/walmart-wages...
[+] [-] thfuran|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikeryan|10 years ago|reply
Its not something you normally pay attention too. I have a 8 person office in SF that I get cleaned weekly. I have no idea what those individuals are getting paid of the amount I pay to the cleaning service.