The special effects team on Ex-Machina overlaid graphics onto the actor. There were scenes where the actor was "motionless" but they observed that the emotional experience of the film required animated overlaid motion to match the actor.
"We also put a lot of effort into things like the muscles contracting properly, and the various pipes and wiring having just a tiny amount of jiggle. And it’s something that you really do not notice. But I remember when we were looking at shots, for whatever reason when we put a shot through to render overnight that secondary animation hadn’t rendered properly, so it was missing. And everything suddenly felt very stiff. And you kick the shot off again, this time with that animation integrated into it, and it works again. It’s not something that you can necessarily put your finger on as being wrong, but if it’s missing then you suddenly feel that something’s strange."
If you realize that a camera is a time-series motion capture sensor, as is a microphone (the position of the diaphragm) then this is actually less relevatory...
That's an older technique that this is based on -- the one that, as mentioned, can't handle both large and small motions. Given that, I wouldn't compare it by that one example.
[+] [-] walterbell|10 years ago|reply
http://www.theverge.com/2015/5/8/8572317/ex-machina-movie-vi...
"We also put a lot of effort into things like the muscles contracting properly, and the various pipes and wiring having just a tiny amount of jiggle. And it’s something that you really do not notice. But I remember when we were looking at shots, for whatever reason when we put a shot through to render overnight that secondary animation hadn’t rendered properly, so it was missing. And everything suddenly felt very stiff. And you kick the shot off again, this time with that animation integrated into it, and it works again. It’s not something that you can necessarily put your finger on as being wrong, but if it’s missing then you suddenly feel that something’s strange."
[+] [-] cat9|10 years ago|reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGA6eJXZAOw
The ability to pick up saccades could have interesting HCI implications if the signal is consistent.
[+] [-] rwinn|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] raverbashing|10 years ago|reply
So the tiny flushes caused by the heartbeat were clearly visible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONZcjs1Pjmk (from 1m30s)
[+] [-] dignati|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] detaro|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ddeck|10 years ago|reply
http://www.ted.com/talks/abe_davis_new_video_technology_that...
[+] [-] joshu|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] callesgg|10 years ago|reply
The video that @raverbashing mentined seams to be much more useful.
[+] [-] Sniffnoy|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] EGreg|10 years ago|reply
http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2012/amplifying-invisible-video-06...
[+] [-] Sniffnoy|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stevep98|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] RobotCaleb|10 years ago|reply