top | item 9753771

A New Algorithm Reveals the Hidden World of Imperceptible Motion

89 points| 3eto | 10 years ago |motherboard.vice.com | reply

21 comments

order
[+] walterbell|10 years ago|reply
The special effects team on Ex-Machina overlaid graphics onto the actor. There were scenes where the actor was "motionless" but they observed that the emotional experience of the film required animated overlaid motion to match the actor.

http://www.theverge.com/2015/5/8/8572317/ex-machina-movie-vi...

"We also put a lot of effort into things like the muscles contracting properly, and the various pipes and wiring having just a tiny amount of jiggle. And it’s something that you really do not notice. But I remember when we were looking at shots, for whatever reason when we put a shot through to render overnight that secondary animation hadn’t rendered properly, so it was missing. And everything suddenly felt very stiff. And you kick the shot off again, this time with that animation integrated into it, and it works again. It’s not something that you can necessarily put your finger on as being wrong, but if it’s missing then you suddenly feel that something’s strange."

[+] cat9|10 years ago|reply
Here's another video of the algorithm being tested against a wider range of targets.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGA6eJXZAOw

The ability to pick up saccades could have interesting HCI implications if the signal is consistent.

[+] rwinn|10 years ago|reply
It would be interesting (and probably very funny) to apply this to a video of a person trying to stand as still as possible.
[+] dignati|10 years ago|reply
And the Person can see itself in a "mirror" that shows the magnified movements, thus making drastic adjustments and shortly losing all control.
[+] ddeck|10 years ago|reply
Interesting talk by one of the researchers on the techniques including recovery of audio from video of passive object vibrations:

http://www.ted.com/talks/abe_davis_new_video_technology_that...

[+] joshu|10 years ago|reply
If you realize that a camera is a time-series motion capture sensor, as is a microphone (the position of the diaphragm) then this is actually less relevatory...
[+] callesgg|10 years ago|reply
That motion was not Imperceptible.

The video that @raverbashing mentined seams to be much more useful.

[+] Sniffnoy|10 years ago|reply
That's an older technique that this is based on -- the one that, as mentioned, can't handle both large and small motions. Given that, I wouldn't compare it by that one example.
[+] stevep98|10 years ago|reply
I can imagine this being useful to show how buildings and bridges move in the wind or earthquakes. Could be quite alarming though.
[+] RobotCaleb|10 years ago|reply
What is this sort of thing typically used for?