Others in this thread are saying the pricing is too steep or that this seems silly.
After working for the past 6 months in an office with 4 shared conference rooms and around 20 people, I can say with 100% confidence this pricing would have been approved pretty much instantly.
The conference room shuffle was a headache every single day and caused constant distraction and productivity loss. I know plenty of other people at other companies who have reported the same issues with their conference rooms. Hell, even in the Facebook HQ when I've gone in for meetings has had this problem (though their system is already pretty decent from what I can tell).
If you've felt this pain (regardless of how first world it may seem), I think you'd agree.
Personally I'd rather just never have meetings, but that's not always an option =)
Product is not for me (private Google calendar covers 7 people and one room well enough), but just wanted to say that your site and app design is really nice. Well done. One of the cleanest-looking I've seen on here in a long time.
I always have trouble with pricing models like this... how is it 2.5X as expensive to have 3x as many "bookable rooms"? Once you write the software, it's trivial to add more "bookable rooms". Why do you charge so much more for the difference, which really just amounts to a little extra disk space/CPU (not that this is an intensive application to run in either regard anyway).
I guess the reason our industry has gone this way is simply because we know we can get more money from larger companies. That's why you always see these arbitrary limits that correspond in no way whatsoever to the actual cost or value of the product being sold.
As much as I love capitalism, there's a few differences as you go up in tiers beyond just room limits. Today the most notable is the ability to manage more than one office location. In time it will will expand since certain things (i.e. SAML, high resolution analytics, audit logs) aren't needed by the typical 5 conference room company. The more stuff you're managing, the more complex the relationships become -- not just an N + 1 operation.
I saw your comment and wondered "how expensive could it really be?" - the pricing is just too much. I ran it by our IT team (we're a prime candidate for using a product like this) and they shot it down immediately on price. 15 rooms for $3k/year?
Pricing seems really steep. The analytics seems cool, but nothing really actionable can be done about popular conference rooms once your office is already built out.
Can someone recommend a good tablet setup for this to maybe bring the price of your total conference room "system" down?
I spoke with one of the devs at a holiday party (Trevor?) and he mentioned there were a bunch of other things that weren't fleshed out yet that might justify the price here later. But yeah, seems expensive.
It's generally not a dealbreaker for most offices. With external battery packs you can get extra days, or you could just get a free standing mount that moves closer to a nearby outlet. Most commercial buildings require power every 8 feet or so on walls, so you're rarely in a power desert.
Just thinking about it more more, there are so many places you could bolt a tablet onto a wall to improve an interface to something.
- think doctor / dentist
- think directory to an office building
- a doorbell with video conferencing
- why not just put a menu on every table in every restaurant.
cwilson|10 years ago
After working for the past 6 months in an office with 4 shared conference rooms and around 20 people, I can say with 100% confidence this pricing would have been approved pretty much instantly.
The conference room shuffle was a headache every single day and caused constant distraction and productivity loss. I know plenty of other people at other companies who have reported the same issues with their conference rooms. Hell, even in the Facebook HQ when I've gone in for meetings has had this problem (though their system is already pretty decent from what I can tell).
If you've felt this pain (regardless of how first world it may seem), I think you'd agree.
Personally I'd rather just never have meetings, but that's not always an option =)
prawn|10 years ago
Rican7|10 years ago
artursapek|10 years ago
I guess the reason our industry has gone this way is simply because we know we can get more money from larger companies. That's why you always see these arbitrary limits that correspond in no way whatsoever to the actual cost or value of the product being sold.
zachdunn|10 years ago
adamvalve|10 years ago
NeutronBoy|10 years ago
pbreit|10 years ago
rootedbox|10 years ago
https://robinpowered.com/blog/how-to-set-up-room-resource-ca...
timcederman|10 years ago
xGrill|10 years ago
Can someone recommend a good tablet setup for this to maybe bring the price of your total conference room "system" down?
groby_b|10 years ago
(In a perfect world, resulting in reduced priority for their requests)
atticoos|10 years ago
Some customers have been 3D printing their own mounts, which is pretty awesome.
Cub3|10 years ago
brazzledazzle|10 years ago
MetaMonk|10 years ago
pbreit|10 years ago
zachdunn|10 years ago
jay_kyburz|10 years ago
jay_kyburz|10 years ago
- think doctor / dentist - think directory to an office building - a doorbell with video conferencing - why not just put a menu on every table in every restaurant.