top | item 982075

Virgin Galactic unveils commercial spaceship

65 points| prakash | 16 years ago |news.yahoo.com | reply

15 comments

order
[+] jodrellblank|16 years ago|reply
There are probably several people around HN who are science-y, grew up with sci-fi and space fiction and have $200,000 to spare...

Anyone willing to own up to booking a trip?

[+] astine|16 years ago|reply
If I had the money, I would. Yet another reason to do a startup.
[+] dmoney|16 years ago|reply
Am I wrong for thinking this is lame for being suborbital? Would orbital designs based on the same principle be feasible?
[+] RiderOfGiraffes|16 years ago|reply
Getting 100 miles up is one thing, getting 100 miles up and then also travelling at 18000 mph is another. You need an extra mv^2/2 energy, which is quite a lot.

To get to 160km ~ 100 miles you need about 1.6 MJ/kg.

To travel at 8km/s you need about 32 MJ/kg.

There's your main difference.

[+] decadentcactus|16 years ago|reply
You aren't wrong, I think the same. I obviously think it is a huge step, and am definitely not saying I could do any better, but I'm more excited for (at the moment) SpaceX to do bigger things to actually get us into a "space age", not just suborbital hops.
[+] wlievens|16 years ago|reply
There's been some confusing communication about SS3 being (or not being) a suborbital design.
[+] tybris|16 years ago|reply
> Am I wrong for thinking this is lame for being suborbital?

I think you know as well as anyone that this is a crucial step.

[+] yters|16 years ago|reply
Nah, orbital is yet another major leap. Right now it's mainly a gee-whiz dealy.
[+] martian|16 years ago|reply
Bronze Age -> Iron Age -> Industrial Age -> Information Age -> Biotech Age -> Space Age ?
[+] knv|16 years ago|reply
I think it's more like:

Land Travel -> Sea Travel -> Air Travel -> Space Travel

[+] lispm|16 years ago|reply
useful -> useless -> stupid