If nothing else, the level of immaturity of conduct by housing.com's ex-CEO and his followers within the company is definitely hurting the burgeoning startup scene in India real bad. To make matters worse, this comes at a time when foreign VC firms/banks were only starting to get comfortable investing sizable amounts of money in Indian startups at a pre-profitability stage. My only hope is that the people in the tech community world over do not stereotype Indian startups to this one bad apple, and up and coming Indian entrepreneurs do not assume this is acceptable and normal.
on the other hand, it's just another business out to make money -- like many others. there are more important things one could get upset about. let's not take things too seriously.
The sysadmins need to change the DNS to point to a status page, perform forensic dumps of the servers, and perform incident response 101 ASAP. There's no excuse leaving an attacker controlled message up for hours.
This may be an unpopular opinion but I think Rahul Yadav was made a scapegoat for all the VCs who put in too much money into housing at too high of a valuation. Yadav has his flaws -- but they are mostly childish, not evil. He gave the so-called adults a perfect excuse to hide behind but it still doesn't excuse the Board for their key decisions related to scaling, burn etc.
As for Rahul Yadav, I think he would have done well to find a person he really respects and to listen to him. Zuck did that with Andressen(no, I'm not saying he's Zuck; just that having a close mentor can really make a massive difference.) The Board could have helped here in lightly nudging him to find that somebody instead of engaging in constant confrontation.
[+] [-] anant90|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] juliangregorian|10 years ago|reply
Paints Sequoia Capital in a rather bad light.
[+] [-] chanux|10 years ago|reply
Rahul Yadav fired from Housing as "behavior not befitting a CEO"
http://e27.co/rahul-yadav-fired-housing-behaviour-not-befitt...
[+] [-] illuminek|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shoo|10 years ago|reply
on the other hand, it's just another business out to make money -- like many others. there are more important things one could get upset about. let's not take things too seriously.
[+] [-] dotheneedfull|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] rokhayakebe|10 years ago|reply
https://www.techinasia.com/india-housing-ceo-released-by-boa... http://techcrunch.com/2015/07/01/rahul-yadav-fired-as-housin...
[+] [-] HappyTypist|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] illuminek|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dotheneedfull|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] sidcool|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cpayne624|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pratnala|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ishanr|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] simonswords82|10 years ago|reply
Edit: Thanks for the feedback, I didn't know some of these (like VWO) were of Indian origin.
[+] [-] boulevard|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ebinjohn|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dylanjermiah|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] boulevard|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] illuminek|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bhoomitv|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ghosh|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] illuminek|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] codeN|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] illuminek|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] linux_devil|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ebinjohn|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] illuminek|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sangupta|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dotheneedfull|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] noipv4|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LaFolle|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zaidf|10 years ago|reply
As for Rahul Yadav, I think he would have done well to find a person he really respects and to listen to him. Zuck did that with Andressen(no, I'm not saying he's Zuck; just that having a close mentor can really make a massive difference.) The Board could have helped here in lightly nudging him to find that somebody instead of engaging in constant confrontation.