top | item 9838908

Panning for Pangrams: The Search for the New Quick Brown Fox

20 points| TheRedBarron | 10 years ago |barronwasteland.wordpress.com | reply

12 comments

order
[+] Steuard|10 years ago|reply
As far as I can tell, the upshot after scoring a million tweets is that the only one with all 26 letters was just

"?????????????????????the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog??????????????????"

This is considerably less interesting than I hoped it would be. (And a little surprising! That's a lot of data.)

[+] TheRedBarron|10 years ago|reply
Yeah that tweet was a let down. I guess the best resolution is that pangrams (or things with many unique letters) are hard to come by?
[+] solaris999|10 years ago|reply
Isn't it a bit silly to throw away every single @<user> tweet? Imagine I'm having a twitter conversation with my friends about who can make the best pangram and this data is ignored just because we're tweeting @ each other?

I'm guessing that the majority of tweets will reference a person. How about just stripping that @word from the tweet?

[+] TheRedBarron|10 years ago|reply
Interesting. The issue I was getting was that it would like tweets that were "@MyFriendWhoHasAUserNameLikeZXCVBNMQWERTYU hey". Should I just strip it of the word "@____"?
[+] marcelftw|10 years ago|reply
At first I thaught "Searching Twitter for a better pangram" was the pangram.

I'm stupid.

[+] bshimmin|10 years ago|reply
"Searching Twitterdjklquvxyz for a better pangram" works!
[+] exarch|10 years ago|reply
Amazingly few discotheques provide jukeboxes.