top | item 9842203

(no title)

drunkcatsdgaf | 10 years ago

you mean hes exercising freedom of speech? Regardless of views, he has that right.

discuss

order

wk_end|10 years ago

No one (here, anyway) is trying to take away that right. Freedom of speech also means that others have the freedom to criticize that speech, too.

stinkytaco|10 years ago

>Freedom of speech also means that others have the freedom to criticize that speech, too.

I sometime feel like people forget this. It comes up every time someone gets dropped by sponsors or their TV network for saying something outrageous (Duck Dynasty, Donald Trump, etc.). Freedom of speech means the government can't arrest you for saying it. It doesn't mean you get an automatic criticism free platform to say whatever you want. All of us (media owners included) are allowed to make our own assessments or business decisions about it as well.

eropple|10 years ago

Man...I'm really, really sick of this lame, lame, lame defense of lousy behavior. Freedom of speech doesn't mean that anybody other than the government has to have anything to do with you and doesn't apply to anybody here in their personal judgments of somebody who's choosing to act shitty.

And maybe it's just me, but it strikes me that, when the best defense or excuse that you can trot out is that hey, it's actually going to get you arrested to do it, the moral argument is not exactly strong.

joshuapants|10 years ago

> Freedom of speech doesn't mean that anybody other than the government has to have anything to do with you and doesn't apply to anybody here in their personal judgments of somebody who's choosing to act shitty.

Man... I'm really sick of this lame, lame, lame misunderstanding of free speech. The first amendment of the US Bill of Rights is a legal embodiment (among many others throughout history) of the ideal of free speech, but that's not where it ends. Attempts to shame (or otherwise coerce) unpopular speakers into silence is still a violation of that ideal.

eertami|10 years ago

I agree that it's obviously nothing to do with free speech.

But it's entirely disingenuous to claim somebody is acting shitty when writing satirically.

ruacartoon|10 years ago

It's not a ringing endorsement when one's supporters best argument is "it's not illegal to say what he said in this particular point in time and space."

drunkcatsdgaf|10 years ago

pretty sure we live in this time and space, though.

vonklaus|10 years ago

Apalled that this was downvoted. Either you are attacking the poster directly or you are against freedom of speech, either way, poor form.