In the past I've been able to just import Font Awesome and custom icons into https://icomoon.io/app and create a custom kit that way. That's something that has existed for free for quite some time now with support for png/svg/font exports. It looks like the Font Awesome guys just put a price tag on an existing idea. Is there something novel about this that I'm missing?
There are definitely some similarities with other services, no question. But we think about icons differently and we think we can solve the problem better. (For instance, you can copy and paste vectors directly out of Illustrator CC. And watch the number of icon sets, we're about to add lots more.)
We're going to keep making things better and better.
I used to use icomoon, now I use fontcustom - using a free tool like that in combination with the noun project (thenounproject.com) I pay for only commercially used icons once ($1/icon usually). What's nice about that as a non-designer is I can prototype for free and only pay when I'm confident enough to move forward with the idea commercially.
I'm not sure what the advantage of a $49/year subscription fee would be when this option already existed.
Yeah my thoughts exactly. I love icomoon. It makes bringing in vectors from illustrator 0 hassle. Sure there are a few nuances here and there, but like you said, it's free.
This is neat. Dumb question, but one I think a lot of your clients will have: how easy is it to drop one of these sets into Bootstrap and have them work the same way Glyphicons do?
Works almost exactly the same way. Fonticons also has all the extra features Font Awesome has -- larger sizes, icons in lists, flipped, rotated, animated. And you can pare that CSS down to be just what you need, too. Speed, speed, speed.
I subscribed to this from the early days, but in the end I cancelled my account. I just didn't get enough value out of it to justify paying a monthly fee. But I probably didn't truly understand what this service is for. Can you please explain it to me ELI5?
Just FYI, previewing icons from the premium set on mobile shows a bootstrap dialog that has all manner of layout issues: too large and wide and icons are too small. Not the best way to showcase the great work.
As you can download custom iconfont and put in on any static server, it happens that they actually sell ~1mb static hosting for 100$ year.
It does not make any sense.
Do you guys have data on the tradeoff between subsetting for smaller file size and cache hits? When people use subsets on the CDN, are they de-duped so the same subset on another site would still be cached? If it does make a difference, would you release data on the popularity of various subsets?
(Also I hope you guys have a search box for that feature - icnfnt.com always made for a fun game of "spot these icons" for the whole office)
Cache hits vs subsetting FA only is probably a wash overall. I don't have numbers for that specifically, but that's my strong hunch.
As soon as you want to add your logo or use a different icon set, it's worth it. I think Fonticons is more important if you're looking for something a bit different, style-wise.
[+] [-] seabass|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fortawesome|10 years ago|reply
We're going to keep making things better and better.
[+] [-] debaserab2|10 years ago|reply
I'm not sure what the advantage of a $49/year subscription fee would be when this option already existed.
[+] [-] colemorrison|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Brajeshwar|10 years ago|reply
1. https://github.com/razorfish/illustrator-layers-to-svg
[+] [-] tptacek|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fortawesome|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fortawesome|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Bromlife|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] deckar01|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] IgorPartola|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gadders|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] readme|10 years ago|reply
Ooh weather icons. I think another weather app is needed....
[+] [-] fortawesome|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] geeio|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sunflowerdeath|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] digital-rubber|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] rory096|10 years ago|reply
(Also I hope you guys have a search box for that feature - icnfnt.com always made for a fun game of "spot these icons" for the whole office)
[+] [-] fortawesome|10 years ago|reply
As soon as you want to add your logo or use a different icon set, it's worth it. I think Fonticons is more important if you're looking for something a bit different, style-wise.
(We're dogfooding Fonticons on Fonticons. And we had a lot of fun with some of our error pages: https://fonticons.com/404.html, https://fonticons.com/500.html, https://fonticons.com/503.html. Copy and pasting icons out of Illustrator makes it super fast.)
[+] [-] hrayr|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fortawesome|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] jarek-foksa|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nestlequ1k|10 years ago|reply