They do some kinda misleading accounting for AWS. They don't count the capital leases as expenses in "operating income" for AWS, it get's counted at the entire company level. So, because they don't have to expense any depreciation/(expense for capital expenditure in some form) at the AWS level, the "operating profit" at AWS is artificially high and would be negative if it was properly showing the economics of that business.This isn't to suggest amazon as a whole is doing anything wrong, they are following accounting standards, but that is one place where the standards for capital leases are misleading if you don't read the fine print.
No comments yet.