AberrantJ's comments

Thank you, I was excited for new drinks and flavors and this saved me the read.

Of course not, because everyone making these arguments wants people to have some magic sauce so they get to ignore all the rules placed on the "artificial" thing.

I'm somewhat confused on how it actually muddies the waters - any person could have read the source code before hand and then either lied about it or forgot.

Our knowledge of what the person or the model actually contains regarding the original source is entirely incomplete when the entire premise requires there be full knowledge that nothing remains.

That's also a good case of the difference between a "Yeah, it'd be cool if you added this feature for free" type of feature request vs "I'm actively paying a company making a hack version of what I'd like from you - would you please let me pay you instead - for the love of god, please please please take my money?"

This time 100,000.

For some reason my high performance meant that in addition to my high performance I should manage these other people working on other projects (that are just as in depth as mine) and this can in no way detract from the amount of work I do.

God I want to quit.

If you're willing to say that a fifteen year old bot was "writing" then I think having a discussion on if current "bots" pass the Turing test is sort of moot

Here's three comments, two were written by a human and one written by a bot - can you tell which were human and which were a bot?

Didn’t realize plexiglass existed in the 1930s!

I'm certainly not a monetization expert. But don't most consumers recoil in horror at subscriptions? At least enough to offset the idea they can be used for everything?

Not sure why this isn’t getting more attention - super helpful and way better than I expected!