DryLabRebel's comments

I calculated the ratios, and ordered them (probably. It's 5am and I did it very quickly)

git: 0.28

rust: 0.42

c++: 0.94

typescript: 0.95

react: 1.10

kubernetes: 1.22

go[lang]: 1.33

php: 1.33

aws: 1.39

sql: 1.40

postgres[ql]: 1.50

c: 1.57

nodejs: 1.62

python: 1.69

java: 1.73

terraform: 1.83

docker: 2.25

c#: 2.29

ruby[on_rails]: 2.40

javascript: 3.00

scala: 3.00

linux: 3.22

html: 4.00

flask: 4.50

mongodb: 4.67

mysql: 5.50

javascript/typescript: 6.50

bash: 13.00

express: 14.00

css: 21.00

Lol, I did the same thing.

Everything about this article and this comment section has started my Saturday off on a 'humans bug me' tangent.

Grymoire is how I learned sed, and is a fantastic quick reference for grep and regex also.

I appreciate how many people have defended this statement as 'clear and straightforward' by providing a way clearer and very straightforward summary of it with 1/3 the word count...

Colin's channel is just a treasure trove.

> competent individuals held contingent attitudes and endorsed cynicism only if it was warranted in a given sociocultural environment.

The paper doesn't speculate on how many cultural environments cynicism is warranted. Is it statistically signficantly different from unconditionally embraced cynicism!?

You forgot another issue:

- containing potentially sensitive data in your notebook

The world is changing, and children should change with it. Learn and understand technology, and the benefits of where modern machine learning is taking us.

But you cannot unironically think we can substitute fundamental skills like essay writing and critical thinking for a degree in 'prompt engineering'?

Would you prefer an article about the future of AI written by a chef, or a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist?

20 people is very low, presumably becuase the goal of the study was sleep effects, and they were using sleep labs, so I'd say that budget was a big issue here.

No doubt they wanted to maximise sample size, which is why they used the same 20 individuals for both the test and control groups.

I think this is getting at the more robust solution.

When youtube videos are taken down or made private, they are not deleted necessarily from my playlists. There's simply an indicator that they video is 'no longer available'. I don't see why something similar can't be the behaviour for GitHub stars and watches?

Same!

I don't think it's really a secret.

It's pretty straightforward to understand that when the vast majority of your sites income is generated from ad revenue, that data is being used to optimize for generating ad clicks, etc., rather than actually giving users the best/most relevant/useful/desireable information for their purposes.