HelloThur | 5 years ago | on: Chrome Is Bad
HelloThur's comments
HelloThur | 5 years ago | on: Chrome Is Bad
Firefox may have a small market share, but exploits for Firefox may even have more value to some entities/governments, due to its use in Tor Browser.
To clear any confusion, all three are extremely secure in comparison to other types of products (which is why exploits are so expensive), however Chrome just edges ahead, due to its sandboxing, and rapid patch cycle.
HelloThur | 5 years ago | on: Chrome Is Bad
For "proof", you can check how much exploit vendors pay for exploits for each browser. For example Zerodium offer:
* $500k for Chrome RCE
* $100k for Safari RCE
* $100k for Firefox RCE
https://zerodium.com/program.html
The higher amount would generally indicate its harder to get an RCE in Chrome.
HelloThur | 5 years ago | on: As internet forums die off, finding community can be harder than ever
HelloThur | 5 years ago | on: State of Cybersecurity Industry Exposure at Dark Web
The article shows lots of stats, but no real evidence.
HelloThur | 5 years ago | on: G Suite Doesn't Let You Contact Support Until Logged In. Locked Out = Stuck
For reference, I have no 2FA, nor did I lose my corporate device. I've always accessed it through a web browser, never through a mobile, therefore when it asks me to verify with my corporate mobile device, I do not know what device it is referring to.
Take a look at https://zerodium.com/program.html
Apache and Nginx have a very similar market share. Nginx has higher share in top 10k websites, Apache has slightly higher share overall.
Yet Apache has over double the price as nginx exploits:
* Apache RCE 500k
* Nginx RCE 200k