JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Remark: The most efficient inbox in the world?
JoelMarsh's comments
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Remark: The most efficient inbox in the world?
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Remark: The most efficient inbox in the world?
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Remark: The most efficient inbox in the world?
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Remark: The most efficient inbox in the world?
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Remark: The most efficient inbox in the world?
Nothing is re-organized or moved or labeled or anything like that.
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Remark: The most efficient inbox in the world?
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Remark: The most efficient inbox in the world?
We won't do any of those things, actually. Our inbox/app is structured much differently and your own natural behavior informs the algorithm (no manual teaching/rules required).
Everything is controllable if you want to control it, but it's the other side that's interesting: if you want to be lazy and let things pile up, Remark will do the housekeeping and make sure you don't miss anything.
Your labels will be safe, and we will never delete anything automatically.
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Remark: The most efficient inbox in the world?
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: How Valve hires, how it fires, and how much it pays
The design of a company appeals to a certain kind of people, regardless of the model. Do you put a premium on autonomy? Work at Valve! Like structured environments? Try Microsoft. Prefer strong leadership? What about Apple?
Or whatever.
Success is not the take-away. Employee-model fit is.
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: A/B Testing
They A/B tested and then went with the LOSING version, because it felt better in their gut.
Go for something radically different if you want, no problems there, but don't test if you're going to choose your favorite even when it loses. That's just dumb.
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: A/B Testing
The last paragraph of this article made me shake my head though. If you do A/B tests and then use the losing version anyway - because it feels better in your gut - you're an idiot.
Choose a different path if you want, but if done properly, your A/B results are fact (among the options you tested).
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Website Impounded
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Show HN: Fundhawk - VC Analytics
1) Sort the co-investor list by clicking the title of each column. Specifically, I would like to see the list in % order.
2) It would be fantastic to filter search results by location, or VCs that match certain criteria.
3) It would also be amazing to get the full list of VCs, ordered by the categories in the results. For example, show me the whole list, in order of who has done the most seed rounds.
4) And finally... a bigger request... if you could include exit deals, that would allow you to calculate their success rate and ROI, which would be REALLY interesting. But I realize that's harder than my other three thoughts. :)
Well done!
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Ben Horowitz: We Like Dropouts, Insane Ideas, Tiny Markets, No Way To Monetize
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Wireframing Tools Suck
For non-drawing features I definitely agree. Linking would save lots of work.
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Wireframing Tools Suck
People that WANT shadows and details and pre-made stuff like that are the people who want to design the UI in stead of the functional specification. The more experienced you get, the less you want them.
Here is an exhaustive list of every feature I need to make wireframes that you would call beautiful:
- shapes: rectangle, rounded rectangle, circle, triangle, line, arrow
- rectangle with an X in it, representing images
- text in a couple different sizes and two weights (bold & regular)
- a few colors (maybe 5). Shades of gray, red, green, & blue.
That's it. Anything else and you're slowing me down. Seriously.
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Do you think the desktop is dead?
It has nothing to do with which device is more important or more common.
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Ask HN: Feedback about HN itself. What do you think?
JoelMarsh | 13 years ago | on: Desktop App for All Your Email
As far as the product... the efficiency is due in part to the behavioral algorithm and in part to the information architecture of the app itself.
The archive and inbox are literally structured in a way that makes it easier and faster to get to everything, find old attachments, search for content, and so on. A deeper explanation of that part is gonna get long without some visuals, so if I may, let's leave it there and we'll post more info when we can (remember that we're only proving our concept with this site).
The behavioral algorithm basically treats everything you do in email as information about what and who is important, and we use that to make sure that important stuff rises to the top, conversations are threaded in a useful way, and so on. As far as I know, there isn't another app that does it like that.
For now (until we get a little further and create some more explanatory materials) hopefully that satisfies your question.