LazerBear | 11 years ago | on: Show HN: New cross-platform interaction between mobile devices
LazerBear's comments
LazerBear | 11 years ago | on: Show HN: Lectio, contextualized comments for lectures
LazerBear | 11 years ago | on: Ask HN: How was your experience using parse.com?
LazerBear | 11 years ago | on: Ask HN: How was your experience using parse.com?
LazerBear | 11 years ago | on: Node.js Best Practices
LazerBear | 11 years ago | on: Node.js Best Practices
LazerBear | 11 years ago | on: Node.js Best Practices
I wonder if any linters out there warn when they see something like:
something = SomeCapitalizedFunction()
Because forgetting to use 'new' is really the only thing I could think of that makes this pattern dangerous.LazerBear | 11 years ago | on: Node.js Best Practices
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: Show HN: Agora – A Chrome Extension To Enhance Your Online Shopping
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: Pokémon Crystal disassembled source code
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: Hoodie – Fast web app development
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: What 4chan thinks of HN
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: Ants swarm like brains think
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: Ask HN: Idea Sunday
Edit: In case I wasn't clear, I didn't mean anything like natural language processing (though that would be awesome). I meant very strict formal math where everything is explicit.
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: Ask HN: Idea Sunday
For every theory, define its axioms and valid logical steps. Let anyone build theorems based on these (validate them automatically), and allow people to fork others theorems to create their own.
It's probably possible to get a lot of proofs from projects like Mizar and Metamath to start with, then let the community build on top of it.
Maybe even a crowd sourced bounty program for unproven theorems, like P=NP. Let people pledge and automatically pay to whoever proves or disproves it.
I think this can really change how mathematical research is done.
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: Is this Twitter's new profile design?
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: OpenWorm: A Digital Organism In Your Browser
I sometimes like to think about the ethical consequences of having that type of data and computation power. For example it's very likely for it to be used to perform experiments in biology.
But who's to say that an organism simulated in that low level is any different from the real thing? If there even such a thing as "the real thing".
And it gets even weirder when simulating human beings. Is a simulated person any different from us? Is he really conscious or does he merely "behave" conscious? Is it ethical to use it for experiments? What about entertainment? And also, it raises the possibility that we ourselves might be simulated in one level or another.
I think that in some point humanity will have to face these questions. Though from what I understand from you, we still have a few centuries to get there... Man, that's something I'd love to see.
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: Introduction to MIPS assembly language (2007)
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: OpenWorm: A Digital Organism In Your Browser
LazerBear | 12 years ago | on: Ask HN: Ex-Intuit Engineer Building Free Income Tax Software. Join as cofounder?