MariuszGalus's comments

MariuszGalus | 1 year ago | on: Bored of It

This is exactly how I feel and I can't want to start sharing this with people.

You can leave the country and not tell anyone the field you are in and inevitably the topic will come up.

Insufferable.

MariuszGalus | 8 years ago | on: Using AI and AR to improve ArcellorMittal's production process at a Hackathon

6 months, here's why: They random forested height data, everyone random forests these days. It's quick and dirty and yields good accuracy. Not only that, everyone seems to support a built in Random Forest training model, programs from pandas/numpy/scikit to R has it built in. Height data seems the easiest to go by, to short and it has a kink that may cause cracking in the future as the metal oxidizes. What were their 3 models? Who knows? But their idea of combining 3 models, that 3 different teams have made is standard in all DataScience competitions. This is called ensembling. ArToolkit for Unreal Engine, someone else made that and they probably just connected a bunch of blocks together with Unreal's script engine. Honestly, 6 months max and you can do this in a day yourself.

MariuszGalus | 10 years ago | on: Craig Steven Wright claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto

Sorry, I'm just taking this a bit personally because I know a guy who ruined a few peoples' lives by telling lies habitually and scamming for investors. For me, Dr. Wright relates to him and already as a bias I paint a bad image.

MariuszGalus | 10 years ago | on: Craig Steven Wright claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto

This guy > http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/imagecac... < cannot possibly be Satoshi Nakamoto. He looks, feels, and smells like a conman. It only takes one red flag to question credibility and this guy has several.

1. Contradicts himself, privacy vs brokering a deal with major media outlets for a story.

2. Faking LinkedIn experience & degrees.

3. Associates believe he is 'crazy' and a 'conman'

4. Failed the writing syntax test comparing his multiple published works to the original posts and bitcoin paper and eventually...

5. ...Shifting blame or holes in his story towards the DEAD known people who've worked on Bitcoin or who had contact with Satoshi in the past.

6. SGI does not acknowledge him or his claimed statements regarding his relationship with SGI.

7. And I'm not going to go any further... the point is, he has too many 'excuses' for every little thing.

I understand he wants to be infallible and unchallenged in his claim, but just the number of alibis and excuses he dishes out, sans his questionable private-key proof, leaves a gut feeling that he's not Satoshi and smells of con.

MariuszGalus | 10 years ago | on: How my Apache server became a malicious free internet proxy

I used the word malicious because I saw people and have a list of credentials now from compromised accounts and spambots. Mainly from Russia. Also, all the sport betting websites that were being hit. I think there must have been something shady there. I was also used for ad-click fraud. :|
page 1