SanjeevSharma's comments

SanjeevSharma | 8 years ago | on: What exactly is Full Stack these days?

This person does not exist. It is a myth created in Silicon Valley. What 'Full Stack' should really mean is someone who can learn new technical skills real fast. Someone with a passion for learning and implementing what she learns. In an ever-expanding technology scope, it is really impossible to know it all, but one can be on a journey to be curious and learn the skills that the job needs.

SanjeevSharma | 12 years ago | on: Ask HN: What's the difference between a cofounder and an employee?

I think this is the best description, but with a qualification. No mater when you joined the company, if you took no salary and got 'significant' equity, then you could be called a co-founder, especially you helped the company get off the ground or make a significant pivot - like Elon Musk for Tesla.

I know folks who are on Founder Board of Advisors. They work/provide guidance for sub-1% equity and no salary. They would never be called 'co-founders'

SanjeevSharma | 14 years ago | on: What is Wealth in America?

Very interesting, all the comments this post has received. I posted this link on HN because I guessed that several readers here are entrepreneurs like myself, who would one day like to be amongst the 'rich' (or according to the articles author 'upper middle class') and would like to know how that segment of society lives. I had no intention of starting a discourse on class warfare ;)

On the other hand, personally I found this article to be extremely instructive on the relationship between 'net worth' and 'income'. As someone who has worked a job all my life, till date, I have always looked as my salary as my measure of how well I was doing financially. This article made me take an alternative perspective and look at 'net worth'. If and when I decide to stop working for money (side note - someone said Steve Jobs worked so he was middle class. He worked, yes, but I am sure it was not for money! He was Rich.) I would like to still have cash flow coming in from my investments and other passive sources. I believe that is what the author is getting to. If that amount at which I can stop working for money is $100,000 per year, I need to have $2 million in net worth; for an income of $1 million (whew!), I need to have $20 million, and so forth...

SanjeevSharma | 14 years ago | on: Infected by the Entrepreneurial Parasite

Excellent point! I guess those of us with the 'bug' or 'parasite' - whatever you want to call it - just march to the beat of a different drummer. We value freedom over security, charting our own path over following the beaten one...
page 1