Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
Scott_MacGregor's comments
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
Especially if the tie breaker is planning on doing some additional business with the VC in the future, you may not have a truly neutral person casting the vote.
So, how is founder control typically structured?
For instance, do founder Stockholders get 2 votes per share to elect Directors with, and VC's get 1 vote per share with a guaranteed VC director seat on the board? Or are Directors elected by founders getting 2 votes on a particular decision item A and 1 vote on decision item B, and VC Directors get 1 vote on A and B?
Does anyone know what is currently going on with this?
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
Separate the wheat from the chaff, and ABC (always be closing)!
If you thought to get their e-mail (in my opinion, the best way to "initially" communicate with most coders) pop them an e-mail and see if they are still interested. Not everyone is a phone person.
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago | on: TROJAN WARNING Do not click: Branding to Founders What Law Firms Got Right
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
Broaden the horizon a little and include founders who are not looking for co-founders among the networking time.
Try it as an iteration and see if it improves the quality of entire evenings experience for everyone.
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
It would take the "where am I" "where is the target" out of the robots equation. You could simply hardcode the desired movements into the robot. Then if you wanted to sell them you could build a learning routine into the code so the public could easily use it after bolting it to the walls in their houses.
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
In a way it seems like the fee to register is a freedom of speech issue. Pay an inconsequential tiny fee to run a blog, or potentially suffer huge financial losses. Kind of like the old Poll Tax from years ago.
It seems like being proactive as builders and maintainers of the internet, and getting a new field added to the WHOIS data for a DMCA takedown email addresses would make the process easier to administer for the complaintants, and more in keeping with Freedom of Speech that the United States is founded on.
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago | on: FCC moves to ensure ‘net neutrality’ to thwart Internet Censorship bill kill
if you Google
FCC moves to ensure ‘net neutrality’
It will bring up the correct page from ft.com (Financial Times). Just click the link from Google and it will let you behind the paywall for free.
All the software is doing is checking that the clicked link comes from Google. If so you are behind the paywall and can read it. If not, it throws you onto a generic page.
Here is a cut and past that will bring the article up (at 5am Austin time)
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
I don't know what the backend is, but if it's on a single shared machine it might be too many inquires on the hardware at once. Maybe ask the hosting company to move it to a machine with a lower load.
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
One thing that I get as a "take away message" from the company is "austerity". I think this was reinforced by the founders speech about the business at Startup School 2010, and articles like this one in TechCrunch stressing the founders homelessness: http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/21/airbnb-brian-chesky/
I may not be the only one with this perspective. If you look at the picture that Venturebeat chose for the article, it is someone sleeping on the floor in an empty room. Which to me does not seem exactly like the kind of PR message that is congruent with hospitality.
Based on his speech at Startup School, the founder and CEO Brian Chesky seem s like a very charismatic guy, which is great for a CEO, but from a business perspective, it seems like it might be time to think about changing the message that is sent out to the public and leave the old message of austerity in the deep dark past.
Good job Brian, and congratulations on the financing!
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
One thing that swayed us as a company to move to Austin was the great business climate offered by Texas. One of the stated purposes of the Texas government is to "get out of the way" so a company can focus on the competition, and they seem to do that very well. That along with the favorable tax climate (no personal income tax, and a relatively high threshold before any corporate/franchise tax kicks in) made Austin seem very attractive to us. You don't even need a business license in Austin. Basically, you can keep and reinvest a lot more of what you earn.
Maybe Kansas City can take a look at what Austin has to offer and use some of the positives to build an even "greater" startup atmosphere than you guys have now.
Here is a YouTube speech by the governor of Texas outlining the Texas philosophy about startups. He pretty much hits on all of the points that we found attractive when locating here. Maybe you guys could use some of these ideas too. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbOtHDshfj4
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago
http://contracts.corporate.findlaw.com/finance/loan/4422.htm...
http://contracts.corporate.findlaw.com/LCsearch.html?entry=c...
Do not try to "wing this" yourself, have an attorney do it.
Scott_MacGregor | 15 years ago