ThinkingAgain | 1 year ago | on: How LLMs Work, Explained Without Math
ThinkingAgain's comments
ThinkingAgain | 2 years ago | on: What does the cerebellum do?
When talking to someone with whom we have a good rapport and good context, this conversation can be done faster. Basically, I/O is slower than the CPU.
Some of the other sentences can also be explained in similar manner.
ThinkingAgain | 3 years ago | on: Apple becomes first tech giant to explicitly ban caste discrimination
Example video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDPTVEqkGa4
ThinkingAgain | 3 years ago | on: Google cancelled a talk on caste bias
As such USA does much better job of telling about racism, then India does about casteism.
However India did a superb job of asking Dr.Ambedkar to write the constitution, by which the upper caste will abide. I am not aware of any other society which has said, "we believe in equality and will allow someone who was discriminated to make the rules by which we all will live".
ThinkingAgain | 4 years ago | on: Trapped in Silicon Valley’s hidden caste system
ThinkingAgain | 4 years ago | on: Trapped in Silicon Valley’s hidden caste system
I was thinking the problem is limited to India and will not get carried over to US or tech industry in India.
Was not expecting to see caste system in US too and was doubting if it was real. I had heard one story where adults in US were introducing themselves with caste. This story talks about even the kids are introducing with their caste. What are we teaching kids?
Every Indian should read this. It doesn't matter if you discriminate or not, the person suffering is not dealing with just you but lots of people. Even if a small percentage discriminate that is bad enough for that person to feel vulnerable for long time.
ThinkingAgain | 4 years ago | on: Neural Networks from Scratch
ThinkingAgain | 5 years ago | on: America's 1% Has Taken $50T From the Bottom 90%
-Increasing the taxes, only gives money to the government and my impression is they are not efficient in using money so overall the wealth of the society doesn't increase.
If we limit how much a rich person can hold in large companies as stock, will it force the rich people to invest in small companies? Now we will have a mechanism of spreading the wealth by the rich person who knows how to use money efficiently. However the rich person will still become richer, not sure yet how to solve it completely. Maybe inheritance law should be changed so that once the person dies all his wealth goes to the employees in some fashion.
Chatgpt answers it correctly. abcdpqrs is perhaps not in the training set. If it is we can pick some othername.