Ymous's comments | WingNews

Ymous | 4 years ago | on: San Francisco Organized Shoplifting Surge Prompts Target to Cut Operating Hours

While I think SF (and most of the West) has us beat in terms of clickbait headlines, it still exists. I found these two today while scrolling through our main tabloid site.

https://mothership.sg/2021/07/lgbtq-instagram-live-knife-vio...

https://mothership.sg/2021/07/return-tray-fine-commentary/

Ymous | 5 years ago | on: How to Type 3x Faster

I would highly recommend leveraging snippet plugins for your editor of choice, something which I imagine would be the coder-flavored version of this articles advice.

Ymous | 5 years ago | on: Stop Firing the Innocent

I'm thinking about this and am wondering, does this mean that in an ideal scenario (where CEOs of every company maximally considers the larger impact of their personal actions reflecting upon the company they're helming), they must all support the same things?

I can imagine two CEO's of companies A and B (which each own exactly 50% of an industry and are precisely equivalent in public visibility and internal policy). The CEOs are also identical in every way except that one supports a opinion M and the other supports a opinion M'

Assuming that they both make public their support, which one would get executed in the court of public opinion? Would it be fair for (any)one of them to get expelled from his/her post just because the masses collapsed the narrative to uphold either only M or M'? (I'm assuming that whether M or M' is the majority opinion is irrelevant)

The only solution I can see is that both CEOs collude and decide to either not support anything, or support the same, agreed-upon thing.

Assuming that is so, what if we extend this past 2 companies, and into 2000?

----

I'm not convinced that the punishment does befit the situation.