acmecorps
|
1 year ago
|
on: We're forking Flutter
We have worked with flutter since 2019; having built internal apps for our staff, public apps for our customers, small utility apps etc- this has been our experience as well. Not only flutter has been rock solid, easy and fast to develop, it has a wide array of libraries. Long may it continue.
acmecorps
|
1 year ago
|
on: SSH has become our universal (Unix) external access protocol
Sorry, I'm new to Tailscale, but I do setup and use WireGuard. What does Tailscale offers that WireGuard doesn't if I might ask?
acmecorps
|
2 years ago
|
on: Amazon acquires Fig
Tried to check it out, but I got "Signups are currently disabled" :(
acmecorps
|
2 years ago
|
on: The end of Reddit? Why the blackout is still going – and what happens next
Also discord stuff are not searchable publicly. The experience is completely different, it's not even comparable.
acmecorps
|
3 years ago
|
on: Building Games with DragonRuby – A free book on Ruby game dev
I love Ruby, but I always wonder if performance will be an issue if there're many things happening on screen especially on mobile. Does anyone has any experience?
acmecorps
|
3 years ago
|
on: Cloudflare had a partial outage
I'm new to this whole thing. Can u point me on how I don't depend 100% on CF, if its DNS is down? Is there such a service? (kinda like load balancing, but with DNS?)
acmecorps
|
3 years ago
|
on: New UUID Formats
You’re not alone. I’ve been migrating my tables to use uuid instead of integers and have been using uuid whenever I have new tables, unless I have very good reason not to. Experience was my teacher.
acmecorps
|
3 years ago
|
on: Ultorg: A user interface for relational databases [video]
+1 for TablePlus! I absolutely love them for the fast editing as well as quick and dirty filters. Beats typing SQL for simple stuff. These quality of life features are really underrated. Absolutely worth the yearly fee!
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: .NET Myths Dispelled
Interesting. I’m a rails developer, and to me one of the core strength of rails is active record (altho some might disagree). How would you compare it with rails active record, and which part do you say it’s much better?
Btw, I know this is superfluous and very shallow, but for some reason, I can’t get over the C# syntax because of how enterprisey it is. I much prefer ruby, but I guess it’s a matter of preferences and taste
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: How it feels to learn JavaScript in 2016
I don't know; I might be old, but for a lot of _websites_, jQuery is absolutely perfect. I love jQuery for its simplicity :)
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: Part of Windows 11 is a revamped Windows Subsystem for Linux
Running it in a remote VM somewhere on the cloud you mean?
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: Mina: Lightweight, Constant-Sized Blockchain
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: How to boost your popularity on OkCupid using CSRF and a JSON type confusion
I'd like to underpromise, but overdeliver - that's my motto!
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: Python for Excel: A Modern Environment for Automation and Data Analysis
What apt timing. I'm trying to do the same thing with Ruby; anyone knows a good Ruby gem dealing with Excel?
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: I wrote a children's book / illustrated guide to Apache Kafka
Not OP, but I think it was a bit of tongue in cheek comment (I might be wrong tho) ;)
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: How and why to become a PostgreSQL contributor
Is that really THE Julian Assange?
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: Deep JavaScript
I might be missing something; is the book free online..? Or, is there content that's paid only?
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: My service to check whether an item is counterfeit or not
Congrats on being on the HN homepage! :). I’m wondering tho - does this check if a website that claims to be selling something online is a scam or not?
acmecorps
|
4 years ago
|
on: Space Cloud: Open-Source Firebase and Heroku on Kubernetes
Noob question: does this supports offline syncing like firestore?
acmecorps
|
5 years ago
|
on: Look, your email validation logic is very, very likely wrong
I used to do complex email validations (like regexes etc), but have avoided using them for a long time. Currently, my email validations are 3 steps:
1. Using the <input type="email">
2. Checking if "@" exists
3. Sending the actual email (which practically speaking - is the actual validation that I needed)
Covers 99.99% of all cases I say.
