albeertoni | 12 years ago | on: The New TextSecure: Privacy Beyond SMS
albeertoni's comments
albeertoni | 12 years ago | on: Just Delete Me
Won't work either but, like this, it's a nice start.
albeertoni | 12 years ago | on: Court Opinion Finding NSA Surveillance Unconstitutional to be released
albeertoni | 12 years ago | on: Obama to Offer Plan Meant to Ease Concerns on Surveillance
albeertoni | 12 years ago | on: Obama to Offer Plan Meant to Ease Concerns on Surveillance
albeertoni | 12 years ago | on: NSA loophole allows warrantless search for US citizens' emails and phone calls
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/07/secret_informa...
Of course, there's also the "I've done nothing wrong, I have nothing to hide,"-type folks, and people who are generally authoritarian too.
albeertoni | 12 years ago | on: Silent Circle shuts down email service
albeertoni | 12 years ago | on: Ask HN: do you trust your "secure email" now?
Of course, it all depends on what your threat model is. Are you a target of the NSA, or a jealous spouse? That's what this comes down to. Neither Lavabit nor Silent Circle could have given encrypted and unattributable email service - so if that's what you needed, you're SoL. If server-to-server encryption was all you were interested in, then the distros of pgpu they used would have been fine for you.
It's hard to think of a threat that would be stymied by server-to-server encryption alone. Maybe someone else has a good idea of what that might be, but it's too early for me.
I use Silent Circle myself, but I assume on Whisper you can't just type in a normal mobile number and have the chat message go to the right person. If you can, then those chats at least are subject to intercept, and maybe the other chats (whisper-whisper chats) are too. I don't remember how all those rules shake out/how courts have decided.